Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Retraction Note: Human HDAC6 senses valine abundancy to regulate DNA damage

read original more articles
Why This Matters

The retraction of this scientific article highlights ongoing concerns about data integrity and reproducibility in research, which can impact trust in published findings. For the tech industry and consumers, it underscores the importance of rigorous validation and transparency in scientific data, especially in fields influencing biomedical advancements. Ensuring data authenticity is crucial for maintaining credibility and progress in scientific innovation.

Key Takeaways

Retraction to: Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08248-5 Published online 20 November 2024

The Editors have retracted this article.

After publication, concerns were raised regarding the authenticity of the numerical source data for Fig. 4c,f and Extended Data Figs. 5c,f and 6c,m, which report results for the quantification of γH2AX-positive cells under different experimental conditions. These datasets show unusual similarities within and between figure panels. In addition, concerns were raised about the similarities between the 5hmC and 5fC dot blots in Fig. 3j and Extended Data Fig. 5o, and the Nucleus/Tubulin and Cytoplasm/H3 bands in Extended Data Fig. 2k. Following correspondence with the Authors, additional concerns were identified in the numerical source data for Extended Data Fig. 10b,d,h,n, which also report γH2AX quantification results and show unusual similarities within and between figures, and in the numerical source data for Extended Data Fig. 9i.

After careful consideration of the information provided by the authors and the investigation report provided by the Tongji University, the Editors determined that the explanation for the similarities found in the γH2AX quantification data was not satisfactory, that the concerns regarding the authenticity of these data are extensive and persistent, and that the independent confirmation of the paper’s conclusions, as reported to the Journal by the institution, was incomplete. The Editors, therefore, no longer have confidence in the data reported in this article.