Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

How the words we teach English language learners changed

read original more articles
Why This Matters

The evolution of the General Service List reflects changes in everyday life and communication over the past 70 years, providing insights into societal priorities and language use. For the tech industry, this highlights the importance of adaptive language tools and AI-driven language models that stay current with real-world vocabulary. For consumers and educators, these lists underscore the importance of relevant, practical vocabulary for effective communication and learning.

Key Takeaways

These “essential vocabulary” lists are called the General Service List (1953) and the New General Service List (2013, revised in 2023).

They were designed as teaching tools for people learning English as a second language, built from real-world usage data and extensively tested. The aim was a vocabulary list with as few words and as much coverage of everyday English usage. That coverage is high, over 90% for the 2023 list1 and about 84% for the 1953 list.2 To account for that much of the language, they had to track a significant portion of whatever people were actually reading and saying. A word earned its place by appearing often enough, across enough contexts, to be hard to avoid for the average person in an English-speaking society. Open the word lists panel on the right to browse through all the entries in both lists.

While these were practical tools, built to capture which words people need most, the answer also doubles as a snapshot of ordinary life, 70 years apart: what people were expected to engage with, and had to deal with, in their daily lives.

Treating the lists as an indirect record of day-to-day life, I went through the differences between them from a few angles: what the words were about, how tangible were they, and to which parts of speech they belonged.

The Expanding World

I started by using a common linguistics research tool3 that sorted all of the words by meaning. It assigned each word to one of 21 subject categories, based on typical usage: Food and Farming, the Body and the Self, Government and Public, Language and Communication, and so on. Together, they suggested what kind of world each list was built for.