Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Flock Accused of Reactivating Its Cameras Without Notifying a Town

read original more articles
Why This Matters

This incident highlights ongoing concerns about transparency and accountability in surveillance technology, especially when private companies re-enable cameras without notifying local authorities. It underscores the importance of strict oversight and clear communication to prevent misuse of surveillance systems that impact public trust and privacy. The case also raises questions about the ethical use of surveillance in commercial and public settings, emphasizing the need for regulatory safeguards.

Key Takeaways

A Massachusetts newspaper reports that officials from the town of Littleton (population: 10,141) "claim that five of Littletonâ(TM)s Flock Safety cameras were switched back on by the company without informing the town..."

Littleton had temporarily disabled the cameras earlier this year, according to the article, but upon discovering the cameras were still active, city officials say they directed the Town Counsel "to initiate cancellation of the contract with Flock Safety and directed the Town Administrator to coordinate the removal of the six cameras on public ways" with the Department of Public Works.

Ironically, it's the same Massachusetts town that last year was breached by a Chinese-state-sponsored hacking group for over 300 days.

Flock has also considered dashcams installed in hundreds of thousands Uber, Lyft, and delivery drivers' vehicles "to scan license plates those drivers travelled passed," reports 404 Media, "essentially turning Uber and Lyft drivers into roaming surveillance vehicles, according to a Flock presentation shared with 404 Media... 404 Media first revealed the intended partnership last August when multiple sources provided information on the plan."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.