GoKawiilOpinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Key Takeaways Scaling starts with people, not systems — and the biggest bottlenecks are usually created by founders themselves through unclear decision rights, weak middle management, over-dependence on the founder and a one-size-fits-all approach to leadership development.
The shift from entrepreneur to CEO is the shift from doing the work to removing obstacles for the people responsible for doing it — or as one leader put it, moving from two hands to 40.
If you want to build a company and scale it into something truly remarkable, you must grasp one principle above all others: your people will determine your success or your failure. And the most important person in this equation is you.
Your role as a CEO is not only to create a roadmap for accomplishing your company’s mission but to remove obstacles for the people responsible for helping you do it. All too often, new business owners unknowingly do just the opposite. Stuck in an entrepreneurial mindset, they create internal hurdles that stunt progress instead of paving a smoother path to success. It’s time to start thinking like a leader to diagnose — and fix — these hidden bottlenecks.
Why business growth requires a people-driven leadership mindset
Early in our journey as entrepreneurs, my brother Sterling and I learned that scalability begins not with systems or even vision but with people. When individuals are equipped to operate at their highest potential, momentum builds. Energy compounds. It’s a force multiplier. That is why scaling starts by adopting a deliberate leadership mindset, not just an entrepreneurial objective. Without it, business owners will create internal bottlenecks that stall growth long before market conditions become the problem. Don’t fall into this trap. For companies struggling to scale, here are the most common yet often overlooked leadership mistakes I’ve found are holding them back — and how to fix them.
1. Unclear decision rights in your team
A lack of clear role definitions between founders and leaders can stall momentum out of the gate — a scaling challenge my brother and I faced head-on. When we founded our first shared business, we struggled with figuring out our respective roles as leaders. At one point, we even found ourselves bickering over titles — talk about a waste of time — all in the name of trying to determine how critical decisions would inevitably be made.
What we learned is that different leadership styles can be complementary when properly leveraged, and decision rights should be doled out accordingly. For example, Sterling is very research-driven while I tend to be more of a risk taker. Assigning decisions that demand analytical evaluation to Sterling and creative choices to me reduces friction as we grow.
... continue reading