GoKawiilSign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!
All is not well in the fourth estate.
On Tuesday, the publisher of Axios hit “post” on an article about how he basically uses AI to read for him now, instead of recruiting the moldering neurons in his brain.
“AI has become my reading buddy,” began Nicholas Johnston, who formerly served as the news site’s editor-in-chief.
According to Johnston, the tedious process of actually reading a book “makes it easy to lose the thread.” James Fenimore Cooper’s “The Last of the Mohicans,” for example, was “too dense” for “casual vacation reading.” So instead, he typed in a prompt.
“I’d like a guide as I read ‘The Last of the Mohicans’ who can help me understand what I’ve read and where the story is, without giving spoilers or getting ahead of my progress,” he asked the AI. “Can you do this, chapter by chapter?”
Johnston noted that the chatbot agreed that the book was a hard one to keep track of — seemingly unbothered, or unaware, that this was an obvious example of yet more AI sycophancy.
“The robot agreed,” he said. And voilà: he now had a “recap of what’s happened so far” which clarifies “anything confusing.”
Lots to unpack here. Is this a sign of early-onset AI psychosis and/or the specific flavor of AI obsession that bosses seem so prone to? Is the 1826 novel “The Last of the Mohicans” really that hard to read? And is this advice even original enough to warrant a whole article? Isn’t this exactly what AI users have been doing with the tech since it hit the mainstream? What’s new here?
Regardless, it opened Johnston up to a lot of mockery online.
... continue reading