Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Embattled Flock CEO Begs for “Compromise” As Backlash Spills Over

read original more articles
Why This Matters

The controversy surrounding Flock Safety highlights the growing tension between surveillance technology, privacy rights, and law enforcement accountability. As public backlash intensifies, the industry faces increased scrutiny over ethical use and data privacy, emphasizing the need for balanced solutions that protect both safety and civil liberties.

Key Takeaways

Sign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!

Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley is struggling to keep his ahead above water.

With the backlash against his company’s AI-powered surveillance network reaching a boiling point, Langley tried to reason with his critics by calling for a “compromise.”

“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said in a recent Fox News interview, as spotted by TechCrunch. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”

It’s the latest attempt from the Flock CEO to save the company’s image as residents of the municipalities where its cameras are stationed fiercely protest their presence and vigilantes tear down or obstruct them. In addition to the mass surveillance that these cameras enable, the furor has sparked around how law enforcement is abusing their access to the Flock network.

Earlier this month, Langley made a public apology after a Washington Post investigation found at least 50 cases of rogue police officers allegedly misusing Flock cameras and similar systems, including to stalk women.

In another damage control interview at the time, Langley said that the outcry against Flock was the result of some misunderstanding, insisting that “we’re not Big Brother.”

Amid the heightened pressure from the public and lawmakers, Flock announced that it would shorten the default data retention window of footage from 30 days to seven, and said that it would force law enforcement customers to implement an audit tool to flag abnormal uses of its search function.

It wasn’t enough to win over critics. The American Civil Liberties Union called it a “step in the right direction” but found that overall they were “merely retreads of previous inadequate safety measures.” The shorter default retention period Flock said it would implement could also be overridden by a customer.

Langley, however sincerely, professed in the recent Fox News interview that the company was committed to being held accountable.

... continue reading