GoKawiilEven at the time, there were critics of his theory, with some pointing out that three of the 56 holes intrinsic to it might have simply been caused by the former growth of trees. As the British archaeologist Richard Atkinson wrote in the New York Review of Books in 1966, "That the layout of Stonehenge has some astronomical significance is not in doubt… The interpretation of that alignment, however, and of any other astronomical characteristics of the monument, requires the exercise of scholarly caution."
The startling 1960s theory that Stonehenge was a prehistoric computer
Why This Matters
This article highlights a provocative 1960s theory suggesting Stonehenge functioned as a prehistoric computer, reflecting early attempts to understand ancient monuments through technological and astronomical lenses. While controversial, such ideas push the boundaries of archaeological interpretation and inspire innovative thinking about historical sites. For the tech industry, it underscores the importance of interdisciplinary approaches and the potential for ancient structures to inform modern technological concepts.
Key Takeaways
- Early theories linked Stonehenge to astronomical and computational functions.
- Scholarly caution is essential when interpreting ancient monuments.
- Interdisciplinary approaches can lead to innovative insights in archaeology and technology.
Get alerts for these topics