Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Garmin Forerunner 170 vs Coros Pace 4: Coros holds longer battery life edge

read original get Coros Pace 4 GPS Sport Watch → more articles
GoKawiil Brief

ZDNET tested two sub-$300 AMOLED sports watches, the Garmin Forerunner 170 and Coros Pace 4, over several weeks of running, biking, and hiking. Both offer similar 1.2-inch displays and weight, but the Coros Pace 4 lasts roughly 19 days per charge versus 10 for the Garmin, with a similar edge during GPS use. The Garmin counters with a traditional five-button interface that some athletes prefer for reliability in bad weather or heavy sweat.

Why It Matters

GoKawiil's interpretation of the reporting above, not reported fact.

As lightweight sports watches converge on similar hardware, battery endurance and control schemes become the real differentiators for buyers choosing between ecosystems. Coros's longer runtime could sway athletes doing multi-day events, while Garmin's physical buttons and broader ecosystem may retain runners who prioritize tactile reliability over battery span.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Coros Pace 4 GPS Sport Watch — The Pace 4 is the battery-life champ in this head-to-head, pairing a bright 1.2-inch AMOLED display with a lightweight build you can wear for runs, rides, and hikes without wrist fatigue. It also gives you full web access to your training data, so you can dig into workouts and trends beyond the phone app.

See Coros Pace 4 GPS Sport Watch on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

Source: zdnet.com — Matthew Miller, 2026-08-31

Published there as: “I wore Coros and Garmin's sub-$300 sports watches - both are excellent, but one lasts longer”

Read the original report → The summary and analysis above are GoKawiil's own, written from reporting by the source above. Facts and quotes belong to the original publisher.