Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

The Download: rethinking child safety and fossil-fueled farming

read original more articles
Why This Matters

This article highlights the importance of rethinking child safety tools to balance their benefits with potential harms, emphasizing the need for improved approaches. Additionally, it underscores the environmental and economic impacts of fossil-fuel-dependent agriculture, advocating for climate-friendly alternatives to stabilize fertilizer supplies and reduce costs. These issues are crucial for the tech industry and consumers as they influence safety protocols and sustainable practices in food production.

Key Takeaways

These tools have had genuine successes, preventing suicide attempts, intercepting predators, and averting school shootings. But they can also cause harm themselves, from false alarms and unnecessary interventions to damaged trust and anxiety.

Child-safety researchers say better approaches exist. Here’s what they think those could look like.

—Kelly Clancy

This article is from our latest print magazine, which is all about kids. Subscribe now to get every issue as soon as it lands.

Agriculture relies on fossil fuels. It’s costing us.

Fertilizer prices have been on a roller coaster this year, driven in part by trade disruptions and high natural-gas prices. That’s because natural gas is both an energy source and a chemical input in the production of ammonia, a key fertilizer ingredient.

The war in Iran has pushed natural-gas prices higher and disrupted fertilizer trade through the Strait of Hormuz—and its closure could make access harder still for some of the world’s poorest countries.

Let’s take a closer look at the surging fertilizer prices, and how a few climate-friendly alternatives could bring farmers some relief.

—Casey Crownhart