Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Isaac Newton’s remarkable year — and the plagiarism accusations that followed

read original get The Winding Trail to Newton's Principia Mathematica (Princeton University Press) → more articles
Why This Matters

A new Princeton University Press book by historians Jed Buchwald and Mordechai Feingold traces how Newton's Principia actually came together, drawing on decades of manuscript research. It complicates the tidy story of the 'annus mirabilis' and the ten-year rule of creative genius, and revisits the plagiarism disputes that shadowed Newton's reputation. For a tech industry fond of lone-genius origin myths, it's a useful corrective on how breakthroughs really form.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

The Winding Trail to Newton's Principia Mathematica (Princeton University Press) — This is the very book the review digs into, tracing how Newton's ideas on light and gravity actually took shape and the disputes that followed. Buchwald and Feingold draw on decades of work with Newton's manuscripts, making it a rich read for anyone fascinated by how scientific breakthroughs really happen.

See The Winding Trail to Newton's Principia Mathematica (Princeton University Press) on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

The Winding Trail to Newton’s Principia Mathematica Jed Z. Buchwald & Mordechai Feingold Princeton Univ. Press (2026)

The ‘ten-year rule’ of creativity and genius, identified by psychologist John Hayes in 1989, states that individuals in both the arts and sciences need a decade of learning and practising a craft or discipline before they can make a breakthrough. Many scientists fit that pattern.

For example, Charles Darwin conceived his theory of natural selection in 1838, ten years after immersing himself in science at university. Albert Einstein’s theory of special relativity was published in 1905, ten years after he began to question the speed of light. And in 1990, Tim Berners-Lee invented the web server and browser that became the World Wide Web, a decade after making his first web-like computer programme.

Unifying gravity and quantum theory requires better understanding of time

But Isaac Newton stands out as an exception. The seventeenth-century natural philosopher, who revealed the workings of light and gravity, is the subject of a penetrating and intriguing book by science historians Jed Buchwald and Mordechai Feingold. The authors have spent decades studying Newton’s manuscripts and published works. Here, they analyse in detail the complicated evolution of his most celebrated publication, Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. It was in this work’s three volumes, published in Latin in 1687, that Newton proposed his laws of motion and his universal law of gravitation.

In 1665–66, during the Great Plague, Newton made three breakthroughs while working mostly alone at his birthplace and home, Woolsthorpe Manor near Grantham, UK. The house is north of Cambridge, where he was then a student at the university.

A page of Newton’s Principia Mathematica.Credit: SSPL/Getty

In mathematics, he laid the foundations for differential and integral calculus to solve complex problems in motion and geometry. In physics, after observing an apple fall from a tree, he deduced that the same invisible force that pulls objects to Earth governs the orbit of the Moon: an idea that he later used to formulate his gravitational law. And in optics, he performed experiments with a glass prism in a darkened room, and showed that white light consists of the colours of the rainbow.

But this remarkable year occurred well before he had accumulated ten years of study in maths or physics. The authors found no reliable evidence that Newton, who was born in 1642, studied maths or science at school. When he was sent to Trinity College at the University of Cambridge, UK, as an undergraduate in 1661, his guardians intended for him to become a minister in the Church of England, and he enrolled in humanities subjects.

After examining Newton’s curriculum at Cambridge and his surviving papers, Buchwald and Feingold suggest that it was in only his final undergraduate term that he started to engage seriously with science — that is, in 1664–65, one year before the plague forced him to seek solitude.

... continue reading