Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Should promotion depend on how workers use AI?

read original get Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI by Ethan Mollick → more articles
Why This Matters

Companies from Accenture to Coinbase are turning AI usage into a performance metric, with leaderboards, training mandates and promotion criteria tied to how employees use LLMs. It reflects pressure to justify huge AI spending at a time when McKinsey says 94% of companies haven't seen significant value, and a weak jobs market means workers have little leverage to push back.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI by Ethan Mollick — If your promotion now hinges on how well you use AI, this book is a practical crash course in working alongside LLMs rather than around them. Mollick, a Wharton professor, walks through concrete habits for prompting and delegating tasks to AI tools at work. A useful read for anyone suddenly staring at their company's new 'AI leaderboard'.

See Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI by Ethan Mollick on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

Using employees' AI abilities as a measure of whether they should get a bonus, promoted - or even sacked - is fast becoming more common.

Accenture CEO Julie Sweet told the Rapid Response podcast in March: "Today, AI at Accenture is how we do work. So if you want to get promoted, you've got to do the things that we do in order to operate at Accenture."

And big names like Disney, Meta, JP Morgan and KPMG have introduced "AI leaderboards" to track and rank employees' usage of the array of LLMs and platforms at their disposal, according to media reports, external. Crypto trading platform Coinbase has already fired engineers who didn't complete AI training, as requested by the chief executive, Brian Armstrong, external.

It demonstrates how eager business leaders are to see a return from their AI investments, especially when 94% of companies have yet to see significant value from AI, according to a report, external by consultants McKinsey.

Employees feel they have to get on board, thanks to the current state of the jobs market - in the UK, vacancies have hit a five-year low.

Meanwhile, 75% of the 1,881 UK jobseekers polled in July by recruiter Gi Group say they would not be put off applying to an organisation that had introduced AI proficiency into individual performance reviews. Around 22% said it would be off-putting.

"It's like being in the sea and you see a giant wave coming. You can get out a surfboard and try and ride it as long as possible, or you can just let it take you under. But you can't stop the wave," says Trevithick.

But what's going on at the large consultancy Pamela (her name has been changed to protect her identity) works for isn't sitting right with her.

She's a US-based senior executive who has observed that, while there isn't a formal mandate for employees to use AI, it's obviously determining who is rewarded, and who is left behind.

"The ground is shifting under us. You've got to demonstrate [AI] fluency and fluidity as one of your key achievements. It's kind of quiet where nobody's saying, 'learn AI or else'. But let me tell you, in performance reviews, they reward who uses it well," says Pamela.

... continue reading