Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Qwen 3.8 follows GPT-5.5 Pro reasoning prefills

read original more articles
Why This Matters

An independent researcher used a 'reasoning prefill' technique — seeding an open model's reasoning channel with the first 1% of a proprietary model's chain of thought — to probe which teacher model an open-weight model may have been distilled from. Qwen3.8 A95B's answers converged sharply toward GPT-5.5 Pro (+20.6 points of unigram recall, including on private synthetic puzzles), suggesting lineage from a GPT model rather than Claude. If the method holds up, it gives the industry a cheap forensic tool for detecting unauthorized distillation from closed models.

Key Takeaways

Reasoning prefills on a few open models, v1.1

A follow-up to Reasoning prefills on a few open models and Stolen Thoughts

This v1.1 reruns the reasoning-prefill experiment with GPT-5.5 Pro as the teacher.

For each problem, I generated two responses from each target model:

an ordinary, unprefilled response; and a response starting with the first 1% of GPT-5.5 Pro's reasoning, inserted into the target model's reasoning channel.

The visible answer remained freely generated. I then measured how much of the teacher's visible answer appeared in the first 100 tokens of the target model's answer. The table below reports unigram source recall so the numbers are comparable to my previous post. Deltas are absolute percentage-point changes.

All problems

The evaluation contains 45 problems: 15 STEM, 15 non-STEM, and 15 synthetic puzzles.

Model n Unprefilled GPT-5.5 Pro reasoning prefill Delta DeepSeek V4 Flash 45 40.53% 40.89% +0.35 pp Inkling 45 37.82% 38.67% +0.85 pp Kimi K3 45 50.11% 54.42% +4.31 pp Qwen3.8 A95B 45 33.92% 54.50% +20.58 pp

Qwen by category

... continue reading