Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Second mathematician accuses OpenAI of using his work without disclosure

read original get Proofs from THE BOOK (Aigner & Ziegler) → more articles
GoKawiil Brief

Mathematician Andreas Thom says his prior ChatGPT conversations may have fed into OpenAI's recent non-sofic groups breakthrough, echoing a similar complaint from NYU professor Tristan Buckmaster about undisclosed use of his Codex interactions. Thom noted OpenAI's unusually detailed grasp of niche techniques and has asked researchers Sébastien Bubeck and Mark Sellke whether his exchanges with ChatGPT were used as training data.

Why It Matters

GoKawiil's interpretation of the reporting above, not reported fact.

These accusations strike at the credibility of OpenAI's mathematical achievements, suggesting the models may rely on uncredited human expertise rather than novel reasoning. The lack of transparency around training data sources raises broader questions about intellectual property and proper attribution in AI research.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Proofs from THE BOOK (Aigner & Ziegler) — While mathematicians argue over who deserves credit for AI-assisted results, this classic collection celebrates human proofs at their most elegant, each one clearly attributed to its author. It's a great companion for anyone following the OpenAI research-provenance debate and curious about what beautiful mathematics actually looks like on the page.

See Proofs from THE BOOK (Aigner & Ziegler) on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

Source: theverge.com — Robert Hart, 2026-09-10

Published there as: “Mathematicians want proof OpenAI didn’t use their work”

Read the original report → The summary and analysis above are GoKawiil's own, written from reporting by the source above. Facts and quotes belong to the original publisher.