Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

El Niño goes viral — and scientists learn what makes people care about the climate

read original get BBC Earth Planet Earth II Blu-ray → more articles
Why This Matters

A meta-analysis of 71 studies with over 216,000 participants finds that emotionally resonant climate messaging drives more action than facts alone, while appeals to individual responsibility can backfire. That matters for tech platforms, media and brands shaping how climate risk spreads online, especially as alarming El Niño warnings go viral.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

BBC Earth Planet Earth II Blu-ray — The study says wonder and emotion move people on climate far more than raw data — and few things deliver awe like Planet Earth II's cinematography. It's a beautiful way to feel connected to the landscapes and animals scientists say are at stake, and a great watch to share with family.

See BBC Earth Planet Earth II Blu-ray on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

Glaciers shape the landscapes of Spitsbergen, an island of Norway's Svalbard archipelago in the Arctic Ocean.Credit: Arterra/Sven-Erik Arndt/UIG/Getty

As warnings about a potential ‘mega’ El Niño grab headlines and spread through social media, communicators face a familiar challenge: how to persuade people to pay attention to climate risks — and act.

Fighting climate change takes more than data — it needs wonder, love and hope

A study, now published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, suggests that emotionally engaging forms of communication are more effective than scientific facts alone in motivating climate action1. But messages focused on individual responsibility had little impact — and sometimes backfired.

“Our findings show that merely providing scientific facts is not the best way to communicate on climate-related issues — you need to connect with people,” says co-author Tobias Brosch, a psychologist at the University of Geneva, Switzerland.

“The emotions you feel when you watch a nature documentary, see the Northern Lights or witness the birth of a new animal imbue these events with meaning,” he adds. “They may also drive you to look better after our environment — by volunteering your time, donating or voting for climate-friendly parties.”

Inspiring awe

The study combined and analysed 71 publications, and included at least 216,000 participants who had been involved in experimental tests of the effect of different public communication methods on climate-related behaviours such as making charity donations or stating intentions to reduce their carbon footprint in later interviews.

“We wanted to integrate all the scientific literature that has evaluated climate-change communication formats, and then look at impacts that interested us, which is climate action, climate-policy support or climate intentions,” says Brosch.

Most of the communication strategies went some way towards prompting climate action. Fact-based messaging — such as explaining the greenhouse-gas effect — increased the likelihood of people engaging with climate efforts. But communications designed to evoke emotions, such as awe at the beauty of nature and fear of the threats it is facing, were among the most successful.

... continue reading