Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

AI regulation calls grow in D.C. after researcher's extinction warning

read original get If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" book → more articles
Why This Matters

A high-profile resignation from Anthropic by a researcher who previously worked at OpenAI has pushed AI safety from an industry debate into a mainstream political flashpoint, drawing statements from more than 20 members of Congress across both parties. With public unease rising ahead of the midterms, AI companies face the prospect of real legislative scrutiny rather than voluntary commitments. Still, bipartisan concern has yet to translate into agreement on what any rules should actually look like.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" book — If the debate over AI existential risk now dominating Washington has you curious, this book by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares lays out the case that superintelligent AI could be catastrophic. It's the most direct way to understand the arguments researchers like the one who just quit Anthropic are making, and a useful companion to the policy fight unfolding in Congress.

See If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" book on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

More than 20 members of Congress have called for stronger artificial intelligence regulation this week after a researcher warned that Anthropic and OpenAI are "gambling with our lives."

Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass, told CNBC's "Squawk Box" on Friday that bipartisan support has reached "a tipping point."

"My phone has rung off the hook this week with rank-and-file Democrats and Republicans who want to see action," Trahan said.

Jacob Coxon announced he quit his job at Anthropic on Tuesday in a post that has garnered more than 150 million views on X. Coxon, who previously worked as a researcher at OpenAI, wrote that the people building AI "earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade."

Coxon's decision to quit set off a firestorm on social media, prompting lawmakers across both sides of the political aisle to weigh in.

"AI is a powerful engine of innovation, and we need it to flourish. But, Congress cannot ignore the realities of AI and the potential risks that come with it," Rep. Nathaniel Moran, R-Texas, wrote in a post on X on Wednesday. "Innovation and safety are not mutually exclusive. We can achieve both through deliberate, thoughtful, and prudent policymaking."

Backlash against AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic has mounted in the months leading up to November's midterm elections, especially among people who have come to associate AI with job loss and large data centers. More than half of Americans say they're more concerned than excited about the growing use of AI in daily life, up from 37% in 2021, according to an August report from the Pew Research Center.

But despite the public's growing unease, there's little consensus about how the technology should be regulated in the U.S. Lawmakers have introduced several different AI bills, but they're in early stages and have been met with mixed reception.

"It's past time for Congress to get off the sidelines and act," Trahan told CNBC on Friday.