Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

US Legislators Complain About Secretive British Court and Apple Encryption

read original get Samsung T7 Shield Portable SSD → more articles
Why This Matters

The fight over the UK's demand that Apple break iCloud encryption has escalated into a diplomatic and constitutional dispute, with US lawmakers arguing secret British orders block congressional oversight. It matters because the outcome shapes whether one government can force global changes to encryption that protects users everywhere, as UK users have already lost Advanced Data Protection.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Samsung T7 Shield Portable SSD — If the Apple encryption fight has you rethinking cloud backups, a rugged portable SSD lets you keep an encrypted copy of your data in your own hands. The T7 Shield supports password protection with AES 256-bit hardware encryption and plugs straight into a Mac, PC, or iPad via USB-C for fast local Time Machine or Finder backups. Dust- and water-resistant with a grippy rubber shell, it's built to travel.

See Samsung T7 Shield Portable SSD on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

Bruce66423 shares a report from The Guardian: A bipartisan pair of American politicians is telling Britain's most secretive court to stop hiding its handling of Apple's legal fight against a government demand to break into its customers' encrypted data, warning that Whitehall's taste for secrecy is 'needlessly' straining relations between the two allies. The letter (PDF), shared with the Guardian ahead of being sent to the investigatory powers tribunal (IPT) on Friday, is signed by the Democratic senator Ron Wyden of Oregon and the Republican congressman Warren Davidson of Ohio. The row dates back to January 2025, when the Home Office served Apple with a technical capability notice under the Investigatory Powers Act, which requires companies to assist law enforcement in providing evidence. The UK government demanded that Apple provide a mechanism to access encrypted iCloud backups worldwide, a call the company met by withdrawing its Advanced Data Protection encryption feature from UK users the following month. Apple's challenge to that order at the IPT was later thrown out after the Home Office withdrew the original notice and issued a narrower one targeting only British users' data. "It is wholly inappropriate for a foreign executive body to attempt to dictate the distribution of powers within the US government, nor should it be permitted to use secrecy directives under the Investigatory Powers Act to frustrate Article I powers under the US Constitution," the pair wrote. Wyden and Davidson write that Congress "is not only a co-equal branch of government, it is the First Branch," and argue that no government can be allowed to place "its demands beyond the reach of legislative inquiry." "The UK government," they write, "cannot champion legislative oversight at home while using administrative gag orders to kneecap the constitutional authority of the US Congress."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.