Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Big AI sets out its terms for regulatory capture

read original get Apple MagSafe Charger → more articles
Why This Matters

This story highlights how leading AI industry figures are seeking to influence regulation in a way that benefits their companies while avoiding direct responsibility for AI safety. Their coordinated approach aims to slow AI progress and establish safety standards, which could shape future policies and industry practices. The move underscores the ongoing tension between innovation, regulation, and accountability in AI development.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Apple MagSafe Charger — Stay powered up effortlessly with the Apple MagSafe Charger, a sleek and reliable accessory that ensures your iPhone charges quickly and securely. As AI and tech advancements accelerate, having a dependable charger helps keep your devices ready to navigate the fast-paced digital world.

See Apple MagSafe Charger on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

Amodei, Altman, Nadella and Musk agree on how government can tame the monster they created

The leaders of major AI labs spent the weekend agreeing on a plan to capture regulators, make more money, and avoid responsibility for their dangerous behaviour. They call it “pacing the frontier.”

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei set the ball rolling with a post in which he professed alarm at how quickly AI is improving and suggested the attack on Hugging Face caused by rogue agents run by his rival OpenAI (OAI-HF) represented a moment that proved something needs to change at so-called “frontier” AI companies – essentially the big US model-makers.

“It’s also easy to dismiss OAI-HF as the failure of one company, but I believe that would be a mistake,” he wrote. “I believe it’s incumbent on every frontier AI company to act as if OAI-HF had happened to them,” he added, because he worries that before long a swarm of agents “could be capable of taking over the entire internet with a persistent botnet.”

REG AD

Amodei therefore suggested “We must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models. Progress will still seem fast, and we must make wise use of the time we gain.”

REG AD

The CEO proposed a three-point plan to regulate AI:

Requiring AI labs to host “embedded evaluators” whose job is to “verify adherence to safety practices and commitments, report incidents, and help assess the alignment of not just completed AI models but training pipelines and processes.”

Frontier AI companies that operate in democratic countries collaborating “to establish common safety standards as well as limits on the rate of unchecked AI progress,” with undefined “forms of coordination” that would be “legally challenging” and “require government support.”

... continue reading