Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Man who faced three felonies for destroying a fake Flock camera has charges reduced to misdemeanors

read original more articles
Why This Matters

The case highlights how disproportionate felony charges were initially applied to a man who destroyed a decoy surveillance camera, raising questions about police overreach and the growing public backlash against Flock's surveillance technology. This story matters because it underscores tensions between law enforcement's use of surveillance decoys and citizens' rights, as well as the broader controversy surrounding Flock camera deployments across the U.S.

Key Takeaways

In context: Remember the recent bizarre case of a man charged with three felonies for destroying a Flock surveillance camera, despite it being a fake decoy? It seems Florida police have had an attack of common sense and reduced the charges to misdemeanors.

It was reported in late August that Evan Meyer, 24, was being charged with counts of criminal mischief causing more than $1,000 in damage, grand theft involving property valued between $750 and $5,000, and damaging or taking a computer, electronic device, or related equipment. All felonies.

Meyer believed he was destroying a Flock camera, a crime that has become increasingly common as anger toward the company intensifies. But in reality, he was destroying a 3D-printed decoy.

To say those charges seemed excessive is an understatement. For a start, a real Flock camera costs only around $800, not including installation fees, so a 3D-printed shell is obviously going to be valued much lower.

However, 404Media reports that Meyer's charges were drastically reduced in a filing by an assistant state attorney this week. The felonies have been reduced to two second-degree misdemeanor charges.

The filing reveals that the damage to the camera, which he allegedly inflicted with garden shears after knocking it off a pole, came to $200 or less. He has also been charged with petty theft involving property worth less than $750.

The sting operation was prompted by several of Oviedo's cameras disappearing. The police department's solution was to 3D-print the shells, attach them to poles around the city, and then get officers to monitor the poles for multiple nights.

Lessening the severity of the charges isn't too surprising when even the mayor, who was unaware of the decoy operation before the arrest, admitted that they were controversial.

There's little doubt that most people have supported Meyer, as Flock has been behind a slew of negative headlines this year.

Those reports have included officers allegedly using Flock cameras to stalk former partners, police justifying database searches with entries such as "LMAO" and "idk", and the company reinstalling cameras without permission after a California city canceled its contract and removed them.

... continue reading