Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Lawmakers target Flock cameras with a threat to highway funding

read original get Spy Point front license plate cover → more articles
Why This Matters

This bipartisan bill would financially pressure states into restricting Flock's automated license plate readers by tying highway funding to compliance, reflecting growing political concern over surveillance overreach and misuse by law enforcement. It matters because it signals a possible shift toward regulating a rapidly expanding surveillance technology, though critics say it doesn't go far enough to curb data sharing or ban the systems outright.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Spy Point front license plate cover — If you're worried about how automated license plate readers like Flock cameras track your vehicle's movements, a privacy-oriented plate cover can help reduce readability from certain angles. It's a simple, affordable way for privacy-conscious drivers to take some control back amid the growing debate over surveillance tech. Pair it with staying informed on your local laws regarding ALPR use.

See Spy Point front license plate cover on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

A bipartisan pair of US lawmakers tell WIRED they plan to introduce legislation today that would strip federal funding from states that fail to restrict the use of Flock cameras and other automated license plate readers. The devices, which help police track the location of vehicles tied to crimes, have become the subject of nationwide backlash in recent months over more nefarious uses by officers.

The No FLOCK Act—for Federal License-Plate Observation and Camera Keeping—directs the US secretary of transportation to withhold 10 percent of annual financial support due to states for highways, roads, and bridges if it fails to ban Flock and similar devices for all but five use cases. Congressmen Raja Krishnamoorthi, a Democrat representing Chicago suburbs, and Michael Cloud, a Republican whose Texas district includes Corpus Christi, are cosponsoring the bill.

The legislation says that Flock cameras could be used only for “enforcing toll systems, identifying stolen vehicles, missing or endangered persons, vehicles registered to persons with a warrant for a felony offense, or investigating a vehicle involved in a felony offense.” Notably absent are uses like conducting traffic studies, investigating minor drug crimes, and enforcing parking and speeding rules.

“Our investigation into Flock exposed serious gaps in oversight, and this bipartisan bill would put clear limits in place to prevent abuse while preserving legitimate public safety uses,” Krishnamoorthi said in a statement.

But the bill stops short of banning Flock systems altogether, which has been the number one demand from supporters of a global protest movement against the Atlanta-based company and its competitors. It also doesn’t stop Flock users from broadly sharing license plate tracking data with other government agencies, including immigration authorities.

Flock did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the proposed bill.

If the legislation is passes this year, states that fail to comply with it would begin losing out on tens of millions to hundreds of millions of dollars in annual transportation funding starting in October 2028.