GoKawiilThis also implies that we've been wildly undermining the true scale of the crushing impact colonization had on Indigenous populations.
We Were Wildly Off About Pre-European Indigenous Populations in Australia
Why This Matters
New research suggesting pre-European Indigenous populations in Australia were far larger than previously estimated forces a reassessment of colonization's devastating demographic impact. This matters because accurate historical population data shapes how societies understand and reckon with colonial violence and its lasting consequences. For tech and data-driven fields, it's a reminder that flawed historical estimates can persist for generations until better methods correct them.
Key Takeaways
- Pre-European Indigenous population estimates in Australia were likely significantly undercounted.
- This revision suggests colonization's demographic impact was far more severe than previously understood.
- Improved research methods are prompting a reassessment of historical narratives about Indigenous populations.
Worth a Look
Bruce Pascoe's Dark Emu (Book) — This book directly explores the sophisticated agricultural and population systems of pre-colonial Indigenous Australia, offering deep context for stories like this one. It's a great way to dig deeper into how historical population estimates and land-use understanding have been reassessed over time.
See Bruce Pascoe's Dark Emu (Book) on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.
Explore topics:
indigenous populations
australia
colonization
pre-european population
population estimates
Get alerts for these topics