Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

I’ve now completely changed my mind about Apple Glasses

read original get Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses → more articles
Why This Matters

The backlash against Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses—now nicknamed 'perv glasses' due to covert filming abuse—echoes the 2014 'Glasshole' stigma that killed Google Glass, signaling that camera-equipped wearables face a recurring public trust problem. This matters because it could shape Apple's design choices for its rumored Apple Glasses, potentially steering the entire industry away from built-in cameras toward privacy-friendly, display-only smart glasses.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses — Since the article centers on the privacy debate sparked by Ray-Ban Meta's camera-equipped smart glasses, it's worth trying the actual device shaping this conversation. They blend classic Ray-Ban styling with hands-free photo and video capture, letting you see firsthand what's fueling both the excitement and controversy around wearable cameras.

See Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

The first smart glasses were Google Glass, launched way back in 2014. The product failed for a number of reasons, but the biggest of these was privacy concerns around video recording capabilities, leading to users being labeled “glassholes.”

The same phenomenon now seems to have finally caught up with Meta Glasses, leading me to completely change my mind about the requirement for Apple Glasses to have video recording capabilities …

‘Glassholes’ and ‘perv glasses’

Google Glass was an extremely expensive product with a number of flaws. The single biggest factor in its failure as a consumer product, however, was a major privacy backlash against their ability to make video recordings. That saw them banned by many bars, restaurants, and other businesses – and users stigmatized.

Given the history, it’s somewhat surprising that the same objections were not immediately raised when the first generation of Ray-Ban Meta glasses were launched. However, that moment does seem to have arrived, with the devices now frequently referred to as “perv glasses.” That’s in no small part to their abuse by misogynistic men using them to secretly film women on the street.

That “perv glasses” label now seems to be becoming as prevalent as the Glassholes one was back in its day. Indeed, it’s reached the point where I personally no longer feel comfortable wearing them.

Apple Glasses without photo/video capabilities

This development raises questions about the public perception of other smart glasses launches – including the Apple Glasses expected to launch next year.

It had been suggested that Apple might launch them without the capability to take photos or record video. I expressed skepticism about this earlier in the year, but that was prior to the backlash against Meta Glasses. I do now think this is the way to go.

Additionally, I’ve been testing a pair of smart glasses with a display and no camera since the summer, and my first impressions were very positive. I’ll be following up with my conclusions sometime in the next few weeks, but suffice it to say, I no longer see a camera as a must-have feature in a pair of smart glasses. Indeed, in the current climate, it has perhaps become a must-not-have feature!

... continue reading