Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Senior Engineers Are the Next DRAM Shortage

read original more articles
Why This Matters

The piece warns that as AI absorbs entry-level engineering tasks, companies are inadvertently cutting off the pipeline that produces senior engineers, setting up a talent shortage analogous to the DRAM crunch. This matters because senior engineers—who can direct AI agents with judgment—will become scarce and expensive just as demand for them peaks industry-wide, forcing companies to rethink how they train talent in the agentic era.

Key Takeaways

Senior Engineers Are the Next DRAM Shortage

There’s a shortage coming that nobody’s put on a slide yet: senior engineers. Every company on earth is about to want one who can drive a fleet of agents with judgment — and almost nobody is making new ones anymore, because AI ate the entry-level work juniors used to learn on. You cannot conjure a senior in a quarter. We just watched this exact movie with memory: DRAM prices went vertical because demand exploded and you can’t build a fab overnight. Senior engineers are next, and the only hedge is to build your own, starting now. The best thing you can build in the agentic era isn’t your product — it’s another Engineer. I have juniors on my team. This is my problem, right now. Here’s how I’m thinking about it.

Stop hiring and mentoring junior engineers and you’ve quietly unplugged the machine that makes senior ones. A few years out, you run dry — right when everyone else is dry too, and the price of the few left goes through the roof.

I’ve written about the org chart flattening from the middle, and about how the bosses are coding again. This post is the piece those two were circling around: what happens to the bottom of the chart, and whose job it is to fix it. Spoiler — it’s yours, senior engineer. It’s mine. And most of us are about to get it wrong in a very specific, very tempting way.

Yes, the Naysayers Are Right (Sort Of)

The doom take goes like this: AI eats entry-level engineering work, entry-level jobs dry up, the ladder loses its bottom rung, and a few years from now there’s a hole in the workforce shaped exactly like the seniors we forgot to grow.

And… they’re right. That failure mode is completely real. If you take the work juniors learned on and route 100% of it to agents, and you do nothing else, that is precisely what happens. And this isn’t just me predicting it. Martin Fowler and Thoughtworks pulled a room full of CTOs, architects, and senior practitioners together in Engelberg this past June, and one of the five headline findings from that retreat was — I’m quoting the report — “an apprenticeship and skills-transmission crisis.” Not a maybe. A crisis, named as such, that came up independently in at least six different sessions. Their words for the failure mode:

If juniors never get to struggle with real code, real production incidents and real design trade-offs because agents (or senior engineers pairing exclusively with agents) absorb that work, the industry will lose a vital mechanism for growing the next generation of engineers with judgment and taste.

Read that clause again — “senior engineers pairing exclusively with agents.” Hold onto it; it’s the accelerant, and I’ll come back to it. First, the machine it’s breaking — because to see why this is a genuine shortage and not just hand-wringing, you have to see what a junior engineer was actually for.

Why We’re About to Stop Making Seniors

... continue reading