GoKawiilWhile President Donald Trump's war with the networks dominates the headlines, a far more consequential fight is unfolding in a Lower Manhattan courthouse. At stake? The economics of journalism itself, and the war is sparking options traders' interest.
On Friday, newly unsealed statements from Microsoft and OpenAI executives threatened the "fair-use" defense in the New York Times lawsuit. The defense rests on showing that the accused product is neither a substitute for nor a direct competitor to the source work.
According to the unsealed material, an OpenAI executive allegedly acknowledged their chatbots were exactly that: an "existential threat" to journalism, delivering the information directly and sparing the reader the click-through, per the Wall Street Journal.
OpenAI allegedly copied millions of copyrighted articles for training, possibly exploiting hacks to retrieve them, and Microsoft's own director of applied science, Brent Hecht, reportedly described the training as "the largest theft of labor in human history," according to the Washington Post, while the companies' own data showed Times' click-through rates dropping precipitously.
OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman, meanwhile, reportedly wrote in 2017 that he was "deeply motivated by the gazillions" he hoped to earn commercializing the technology, according to the Financial Times, and allegedly replied "ah nice" when told an employee had found a hack around the Times' paywall.
These findings meaningfully raise the odds of either a massive settlement and licensing deal or, failing that, a Times victory at trial that would be catastrophic for the defendants and enormously remunerative for the plaintiff.
The one wrinkle for the Times was the September 1st statement of interest from the Department of Justice asking the court to hold that training AI models on copyrighted work is fair use, citing national security. If foreign adversaries will train on anything they can access by any means, the argument goes, restricting U.S. systems risks ceding an insurmountable lead.
Given the enormity of what's at stake, you would think this would garner more investor attention, but New York Times shares have been flat year-to-date and barely moved on Friday.