Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Dyson Won’t Say What’s Wrong With Its CameraJet Toothbrush

read original get Waterpik Sonic-Fusion 2.0 Flossing Toothbrush → more articles
Why This Matters

Dyson's ambitious $499 CameraJet toothbrush, which combined brushing with camera-guided water flossing, has apparently been pulled from sale just weeks after launch amid unexplained technical issues, including reports of water leaking into the battery compartment. The episode highlights the risks of over-engineering everyday products and raises questions about Dyson's quality control and transparency with consumers.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Waterpik Sonic-Fusion 2.0 Flossing Toothbrush — If Dyson's camera-equipped CameraJet has you intrigued but wary, the Waterpik Sonic-Fusion 2.0 offers the same brushing-plus-water-flossing concept in an already established, well-known device. It combines sonic brushing with water flossing in a single handle, tackling the same tricky between-teeth gaps the article discusses without needing a built-in camera.

See Waterpik Sonic-Fusion 2.0 Flossing Toothbrush on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

There's always a danger in over-complicating products. Simple is so often best. The apocryphal story of NASA spending millions crafting a space pen while Soviet cosmonauts used a pencil is often cited as a prime example, even if it's actually not true. Perhaps it's not surprising that Dyson has got into hot water trying to reinvent the electric toothbrush.

The Chinese invented the first bristle toothbrush during the Tang dynasty or 15th century. That concept muddled along quite nicely until 1937, when Tomlinson Moseley filed a patent for the earliest electric toothbrush. After more than 400 years, the Motodent marked the beginning of an evolutionary shift from manual brushing to powered oral care.

Having had considerable success reimagining established product categories such as stick vacuums and premium hair dryers—though not so much air-purifying headphones—the company earlier this month, with great fanfare, unveiled the next leap forward for teeth: the $499 Dyson CameraJet with a tiny camera to aim streams of rinsing fluid into the gaps between your teeth.

Others, like the Waterpik Sonic-Fusion 2.0, have already been daring (or foolhardy) enough to combine brushing and water flossing. However, Dyson upped the ante further by adding a macro-lens camera, allowing its “Gap Optical Targeting system,” trained on 470,000 dental images, to identify within 100 milliseconds precisely where to squirt fluid from the 12.5 milliliters of mouth rinse stored in its on-board reservoir.

It's taken Dyson six years, 38 patents, and an awful lot of money to make this camera-squirt-brush doohickey work. However, something has gone badly wrong with the CameraJet. So wrong that despite James Dyson globally launching the product at a Paris event mere weeks ago, you can no longer, as far as WIRED can ascertain, buy the CameraJet anywhere.

The CameraJet launched in US stores on September 8. Just a day later, reports began outlining the first user complaints of water in the battery compartment and failures within 30 seconds of use. Consumer Reports' own review unit stopped working less than 24 hours after unboxing. On September 11, French outlet Numerama reported that the French Dyson site and stores had reportedly stopped selling the toothbrush. By September 15, stores in the US, UK, and Singapore, where Dyson's headquarters now reside, had followed suit.

Dyson has taken the electric toothbrush and thrown the bathroom sink at it, adding cameras and a liquid reservoir. Courtesy of Dyson

Despite the product disappearing from shelves and online stores, Liv Thomas, the company's head of Beauty Communications, insists to WIRED that the CameraJet hasn't been recalled. Instead, the gadget is “experiencing strong demand globally” and “shortages of supply as we are in the process of scaling up production." Units will reappear supposedly in “the coming weeks.” But what about the multiple reports of breakages, leaking, and battery failures in multiple countries?