CNET staff -- not advertisers, partners or business interests -- determine how we review products and services. If you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.
I’ve reviewed virtual and augmented reality tech for well over a decade, going all the way back to Google Glass in 2013. And yet, the category of smart glasses still feels strange and new. Part of that is because smart glasses take on many different forms. They’re all lightweight things that have tech in them and rest on your nose for your eyes to see through. Beyond those similarities, clear differences emerge.
In the future, smart glasses are likely to be full-fledged augmented reality devices much like Meta showed off last fall with the Orion prototype I test-drove. But in the present, and for the purposes of this list, the most popular products in this space are either AI-enabled audio and camera-equipped glasses, or tethered display glasses. They’re very different sets of products and experiences, but down the road their roles are likely to blend. While we have favorites in the category right now, it's also a good time to pause before grabbing a pair of smart glasses. Better products might be right around the corner.
What are the best smart glasses?
Today, the best pair of smart glasses you can buy are Meta’s Ray-Bans. These nearly normal-looking camera and audio glasses are fully wireless, have surprisingly good off-ear audio and microphones for playing music or taking calls, and can capture photos and vertical video clips that can be shared via your phone. They also have a growing and surprisingly functional set of AI features that can use the camera to assist in seeing and translating the world around you. Oakley Meta glasses are also out now with even better battery life and improved video recording, but we’re still testing them. Will Meta update the Ray-Bans with a better battery soon, too?
Another pair of glasses-like hardware you should consider are the Xreal One and One Pro. They’re not all-day glasses. Instead, think of them as wearable wired displays that plug into nearly any USB-C device such as a phone or a laptop. The Xreal One can be a portable monitor or on-the-go movie screen, and they do a great job at it. Viture’s Luma Pro and upcoming Beast glasses offer brighter displays, although with fewer onboard display settings.
Best smart glasses of 2025
Scott Stein/CNET Photo Gallery 1/1 Scott Stein/CNET Best Smart Glasses Overall Meta Ray-Bans Pros Great audio and microphone quality
Truly look like regular glasses
Good photos, videos have solid stabilization
Meta AI has useful assistive features that keep evolving Cons Won't last a day on a charge
Needs case to recharge
Only shoots vertical wide-angle video
Won't work with other AI platforms Meta’s second-generation smart glasses have proven to be a relatively big success, and for good reason. The normal-looking glasses have a familiar Ray-Ban look but include surprisingly good onboard audio for phone calls and music listening, as well as a camera that records photos and wide-angle vertical video clips up to three minutes in length. A side trackpad and shutter button control the glasses manually, but you can also use voice controls to operate everything. They come in a large range of styles and colors, and optional sunglass lens finishes and prescription lens support.
The more evolutionary feature on these glasses is the AI assistance, which works not only via voice chat, but can “see” what your glasses record and provide descriptions, translations and other feedback on the fly. Meta’s AI is constantly evolving new functions. Right now there’s a live AI mode that burns up battery life, or a version that can take photos from your glasses and analyze them seconds later. As assistive glasses, they’ve got a lot of potential.
The off-ear audio quality is very good, and so are the microphones, but they’re not noise-cancelling and can be hard to hear in loud areas. The camera can be great too, but the wide-angle shots can’t zoom in close.
A big limit is battery life. Ray-Bans last a few hours on a charge and need an included battery-enabled glasses case to charge up on the go. Meta’s newer Oakley Meta glasses have longer battery life, but also a higher price and a more limited range of designs. For now, Meta’s glasses are unmatched for their overall quality and design. ... Show more Get it now $299 at Meta Specs & Configurations Weight 49 to 51 grams Camera Yes (12MP) Voice activated Yes Controls Side touchbar, capture button or voice Display N/A Battery life Roughly 3 to 4 hours Wireless Yes (Bluetooth and local Wi-Fi) AI Yes (Meta AI) Compatibility iOS, Android phones, Bluetooth audio Learn more Meta Ray-Bans review Add to compare
Photo Gallery 1/1 Best Wearable Displays Xreal One Pros Vivid displays
Improved in-glasses audio
Can pin displays in place while working
Work with nearly any USB-C type device to mirror your screen Cons These types of display glasses still need to tethered to work
Not 4K For $500 and $600 respectively, Xreal’s newest line of display glasses called Xreal One and One Pro offer excellent-looking microOLED displays to play back movies and games or mirror your laptop or tablet monitor. The killer feature, though, is an ability to fix displays in place so you can turn your head around without the display feeling glued to your face. For working on a laptop, it makes it feel a lot more like a real monitor is floating in front of you. Xreal added support for a wider-screened curved monitor mode on laptops, too. The electrochromic outer lenses can dim to three levels to help block out outside light while you’re wearing them.
Xreal has multiple other onboard display settings that give these glasses an advantage, like changing display size and an auto-transparency mode that turns the sunglass opacity off and on as you turn away from a pinned display. The step-up Pro glasses have a slightly larger-looking field of view and flatter, less reflective lenses for projecting the display to your eyes that are worth the upgrade. But both glasses only have 1080p display resolution, which is good enough but not 4K. ... Show more Get it now $579 at Amazon Specs & Configurations Weight 84 grams (87 for Pro) Camera Optional, sold separately for $99 Voice activated No Controls Side buttons Display microOLED, 50 degree FOV (57 for Pro), 600/700 nits brightness, 1920x1080 resolution Battery life NA Wireless No (tethered via USB-C cable) AI No Compatibility USB-C video-out devices including iOS, Android, Mac, Windows, Steam Deck Learn more Xreal One review Add to compare
Photo Gallery 1/1 Brightest, Highest-Res Gaming Glasses Viture Luma Pro Pros Bright, vivid microOLED displays
Magnetic tethering cable just snaps on
Included onboard camera
Vision adjustment up to -4 via included diopters Cons No extra display setting modes on-glasses beyond color temp
Like all display glasses, still needs tethering to work Viture’s newest glasses have an edge on Xreal in the display department, with notably brighter microOLED displays at a slightly higher resolution and a taller aspect ratio (16:10 vs 16:9). For plugging into handheld game consoles or other game devices, their vividness stands out.
Luma Pro also has onboard adjustable prescription support for up to -4 myopia via diopter dials on both lenses. The USB-C cable to tether with your own device also has a magnetic pin end to snap onto these glasses to charge, which makes it easier to pop on in a pinch than others, but requires that proprietary cable. The electrochromic outer lenses can auto-dim the outside world if needed at three levels of opacity.
A lack of extra display settings on-glasses makes these feel less versatile than Xreal One, but as a pure display experience for rich gaming color, these stand out. ... Show more Get it now $499 at Amazon Specs & Configurations Weight 79 to 81 grams Camera Yes Voice activated No Controls Side buttons Display microOLED, 52 degree FOV, 1000 nits brightness, 1920x1200 resolution Battery life N/A Wireless No (tethered via USB-C cable) AI No Compatibility USB-C video-out devices including iOS, Android, Mac, Windows, Steam Deck Learn more Viture Luma Pro review Add to compare
Other smart glasses we've tested Oakley Meta HSTN glasses: Meta's newest pair of smart glasses has better battery life and improved video recording, but a higher price and more limited set of designs.
Xreal Air 2 Pro: Xreal's older pair of display glasses lack the extra settings in the One that make it more useful, but could be a good deal on sale.
Rayneo Air 2S: Competitor display glasses that didn't wow us as much as Xreal and Viture offerings.
Viture Pro XR: Viture's last-gen glasses could still impress if on sale at the right price.
Snap Spectacles: Developer-focused augmented reality glasses that should be arriving in a new consumer form next year.
How I test smart glasses Right now, each pair of smart glasses often feels like a window into a different type of product. In the early days of a tech category, there aren’t always consistent parts to compare across all devices. But I take on AI glasses and display glasses pretty differently. I review products ambiently, using them as much as I can in my everyday life and noting when the features are particularly attractive and when there’s awkwardness or friction. I also aim to use them enough to see if features that seem exciting at first lose some of their sparkle after a week or two. I pay attention to daily battery life on wireless glasses, using them to play music, take photos and videos and make AI requests. On different days I alternate the patterns to note changes in battery life. I make phone calls, listen to music and use them as I normally would. Can I use them instead of taking out my phone? If so, for how long? For display glasses, I compare the visual quality to VR headsets like the Meta Quest and Apple Vision Pro, both for field of view, and for color quality and brightness and observed resolution quality. Display types vary widely on glasses and headsets, and I prefer to note how good the displays seem compared to TVs and screens everywhere else in my home. Would I prefer these displays over using something else? The Oakley HSTN glasses (left) next to Meta's Ray-Ban Wayfarers (right). Similar size and camera placement, pretty different styles. Scott Stein/CNET
Factors to consider when buying smart glasses There’s one big question looming over anyone who considers smart glasses tech right now: Do you want to wear something with tech on your face? And, for how long? The decision when it comes to display-enabled tethered glasses and wireless glasses is pretty different. Display glasses vs camera and audio glasses Tethered glasses are really more like eye headphones that you’re perching on your face over your eyes. Although they have somewhat see-through lenses, they’re not made for all-day wear. You’ll put them on for movies, playing games or doing work, and then take them off. The commitment level might be a couple of hours a day at most. Meanwhile, wireless smart glasses aim to be true everyday glasses. They’ll likely replace your existing glasses, become an additional pair or maybe act as smart sunglasses. But if you’re doing that, keep in mind you’ll need to outfit them with your prescription… or, get used to the limited battery life of wireless glasses. Meta Ray-Bans last several hours on a charge, depending on how they’re used. After that, they need to be recharged in their case, so you’ll need to wear another pair of glasses or just accept wearing a pair with a dead battery. Live AI, Meta's newest Ray-Bans feature, can keep a constant camera feed on the world. I tested it out. Scott Stein/CNET AI and its limits You’ll also want to consider what you’ll use the glasses for, and what devices or AI services you use. Wireless audio and video glasses like Ray-Bans need a phone app to pair and use with, but they can also act as basic Bluetooth headphones with any audio source. However, Meta Ray-Bans are limited to Meta AI as the functioning onboard AI service, with a few hook-ins to apps like Apple Music, Spotify, Calm and Facebook’s core platforms. You’re living in Meta’s world. Google’s next wave of devices should be more flexible, tapping into Gemini AI and more Google apps and services. But we still don’t know the limits of those glasses and headsets, either. AI-enabled glasses can often use AI and the onboard camera for a number of assistive purposes like live translation or describing an environment in detail. For those with vision loss or assistive needs, AI glasses are starting to become an exciting and helpful type of device, but companies like Meta -- and Google next year -- need to keep introducing new features to help. Meta’s AI functions on glasses aren’t as flexible as the AI apps on phones and computers -- you can’t necessarily add documents and personal information into it in the same way you can with other services. At least, not yet. Display glasses have limits, too Display-enabled tethered glasses use USB-C to connect to gadgets that can output video via USB-C, like phones, laptops, tablets and even handheld game consoles. But they don’t all work the same. Phones can sometimes have app incompatibilities, preventing copyrighted videos from playing in rare instances (like Disney+ on iPhones). Steam Decks and Windows game handhelds work with tethered display glasses, but the Nintendo Switch and Switch 2 don’t, and need proprietary and bulky battery pack “mini docks” sold separately to send a signal through. Some glasses-makers like Xreal are building more custom chipsets in-glasses to pin displays in space or customize display size, while others lean on extra software only available on laptops or certain devices to perform extra tricks. Lexy Savvides You probably should wait If this all sounds like a bit of a Wild West landscape, that’s because it is. Glasses right now remind me of the wrist wearable scene before the Apple Watch and Android watches arrived: It was experimental, inconsistent, sometimes brilliant and sometimes frustrating. Expect glasses to evolve quickly over the next few years, meaning your choice to buy in now is not guaranteed to be a perfect solution down the road. There are other options coming that are likely worth waiting for. Luma’s high-end Beast glasses coming this fall should offer excellent wide viewing areas and improved, anti-reflective prism lenses that will compete with the Xreal One Pro. Google is expected to release its own line of AI glasses with Warby Parker and other brands next year, offering a true competitor to Meta’s glasses line. And Meta is expected to have new glasses this fall, possibly a high-end line with a display and a gesture-registering neural input wristband, and there could be updated Ray-Bans, too.