is a senior science reporter covering energy and the environment with more than a decade of experience. She is also the host of Hell or High Water: When Disaster Hits Home , a podcast from Vox Media and Audible Originals.
Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
Google’s latest pledge to support a new clean energy technology is… a gas project? To be precise, it’s a gas-fired power plant outfitted with filtering devices to capture its planet-heating carbon emissions. Is this just a polluting fossil fuel project in sheep’s clothing?
Google just inked an agreement to support the development of a new gas-fired power plant in Illinois called the Broadwing Energy Center. It’ll be paired with carbon capture and storage (CCS), technology meant to filter carbon dioxide from smokestack emissions and then store it underground so that the greenhouse gas doesn’t build up in the atmosphere.
Is this just a polluting fossil fuel project in sheep’s clothing?
In theory, that’s supposed to help the planet from heating beyond the point at which rising sea levels render entire coastal communities unlivable and ocean warming kills off the world’s coral reefs, among other disasters brought on by climate change. In reality, CCS is mired in doubts about its technical and financial feasibility. There’s also a healthy amount of skepticism over whether CCS will only prolong dependence on fossil fuels rather than encouraging a transition to more sustainable sources of energy, like solar and wind power.
Google says it has agreed to purchase “most” of the power that the new 400MW-capacity power plant at Broadwing produces once it starts operating in 2030. “Our goal is to help bring promising new CCS solutions to the market while learning and innovating quickly,” Google says in its announcement today.
So far, CCS has a pretty checkered track record in the US. The US Department of Energy (DOE) has burned through hundreds of millions of dollars on failed CCS projects, according to a 2021 report by the Government Accountability Office. Of nearly $684 million spent on CCS projects at six coal plants, only one of them ever came online. The other projects suffered from “factors affecting their economic viability,” the GAO report says.
The cost of electricity from power plants combined with carbon capture is at least 1.5 to 2 times more expensive than that from solar, wind, or traditional coal and gas power plants without CCS, according to a 2023 report based on facilities in Australia. Already, rising electricity demand from data centers have contributed to climbing utility bills in the US.
The single CCS project that moved forward in the US with DOE support came online in 2017 before shuttering for a few years starting in 2020, when the covid-19 pandemic sent oil prices crashing. Why was it so sensitive to oil prices when the plant burned coal? The project supplied captured CO2 to an “enhanced oil recovery” project, a process involving shooting the CO2 deep into the ground to force out hard-to-reach reserves, as a means of staying financially viable.
... continue reading