Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Which States Actually Have the Best Laws Against License Plate Surveillance?

read original get PrivacyShield License Plate Cover → more articles
Why This Matters

This article highlights the importance of strong privacy laws in the face of rapidly advancing license plate surveillance technology, which poses significant risks to individual privacy and civil liberties. Effective legislation can help protect consumers from intrusive tracking and AI-driven monitoring, ensuring a balance between security and privacy. As surveillance tools become more sophisticated, understanding and supporting robust legal protections is crucial for safeguarding personal freedoms.

Key Takeaways

The rise of license plate trackers like controversial surveillance company Flock Safety and Motorola's VehicleManager has turned a drive through the neighborhood into a permanent digital record. While these systems started as simple tools to log tags, they've evolved into something far more intrusive. With modern AI recognition capabilities, a camera can now instantly identify not just a car, but a person's face and other unique markers, creating a detailed map of your movements without you ever knowing you're being watched.

That raises a large question: What are the best privacy protection laws? I wanted to provide more details for anyone wondering what to support or what their state is currently doing. One challenge is that every state is different, and there's no clear guide on what privacy laws work and which have flaws.

I spoke to Chad Marlow, senior policy counsel and lead for the American Civil Liberties Union's surveillance work, to find the best examples. These laws are making the biggest difference in our privacy.

"Collective action, rather than individual action, is required," Marlow told me. "I would caution that while Flock is the most problematic ALPR company in America, there are many other ALPR companies, like Axon and Motorola, that present serious privacy risks, so switching from Flock to Axon/Motorola ALPRs at best may constitute minimal harm reduction, but it is far from a solution."

Which of today's laws are a better solution? This is a "throw everything against the wall and see what sticks" situation. Let's talk about what's sticking.

The best laws on the books for limiting new surveillance technology

The details matter when it comes to laws against surveillance. Lawrence Glass/Getty

Current privacy laws focus on two recent capabilities of local law enforcement: ALPRs, or automatic license plate readers, that can identify and track cars, and drone surveillance equipped with AI cameras. Security companies, such as Flock, are also starting to offer more traditional cameras that can provide live views and track people from the ground.

With AI features like Flock's "Freeform" technology that let police enter any type of search they like to see what cameras bring up, these are powerful tools, and new legislation is required to address them. Let's go over several categories of laws that make a difference.

Laws restricting the use of AI detection features

... continue reading