Whoop vs. Fitbit Air: I used both to track my health and fitness for a month - this one's better

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.

Fitness bands are making a resurgence, and Google wants in on the party. Recently, I got a chance to review the new Fitbit Air.

The $100 fitness band takes aim at popular offerings like the Whoop as an inexpensive alternative to premium health trackers (annual subscriptions start at $200, rising to $360). While Whoop caters to a serious athletic audience, the Fitbit Air goes more mainstream, designed for regular users at a more approachable price point (and no subscription required).

Also: I wore Google's Fitbit Air to track my health for a week, and it's a serious Whoop rival for less money

The devices are similar. They ditch the screen for a band form factor and utilize apps as the center of the health-tracking experience. They both track activity, sleep, recovery, and stress, and, of course, they have complex AI assistants (though Google's AI Health Coach is available only with its premium membership tier).

So which should you buy? That depends on how much you're willing to spend and what you want. While I haven't tried the Fitbit Air out yet, I've compared the specs of both devices and considered their product offerings to break down the pros and cons.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

At a glance

... continue reading