Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Boeing’s Starliner Is Such a Disaster That We Don’t Even Have Words

read original more articles
Why This Matters

Boeing’s Starliner has faced significant setbacks, including failed test flights and technical issues, highlighting ongoing challenges in space vehicle development. Its struggles underscore the risks and delays faced by legacy aerospace companies in competing with newer, more agile players like SpaceX. This situation emphasizes the importance of rigorous oversight and innovation in ensuring reliable space transportation for future missions.

Key Takeaways

Sign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!

Boeing’s Starliner, originally intended to serve as an alternative to SpaceX’s workhorse Dragon spacecraft, has been nothing short of a disaster.

It’s been just over two years since the spacecraft launched to the International Space Station with NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams on board, a maiden crewed voyage following years of delays and major technical setbacks. But thanks to persistent issues with the thrusters and major helium leaks, the capsule stranded the duo in space for nine months, and eventually returned without anybody on board.

Since then, Boeing has continued to struggle to get its act together — over a decade and a half after it struck up its Commercial Crew Program contract with NASA. As Spaceflight Now reports, the long-awaited follow-up to the calamitous test flight — which won’t even have a crew on board — still doesn’t have an official launch date and could be as far as a year away.

The clock is ticking. The ISS will be retired in a matter of four years, which could make the spacecraft obsolete after spending well over $2 billion on it and failing to ever successfully send astronauts to space and back on the type of round trips it was designed for.

The news comes roughly four months after NASA released a Program Investigation Team (PIT) report, classifying Wilmore and Williams’ harrowing journey as a “Type A mishap,” a classification that indicates “property damage equal to or greater than $2 million or more.”

The report concluded that “cultural and leadership challenges” had “undermined technical rigor and exacerbated technical risks, blaming the space agency for a hands-off approach to the capsule’s development, and Boeing’s insufficient engineering oversight.

At the time, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman acknowledged the failures, writing in a letter that “we are taking ownership of our shortcomings.”

“But to be clear: NASA will not fly another crew on Starliner until technical causes are understood and corrected, the propulsion system is fully qualified, and appropriate investigation recommendations are implemented,” he added.

This week, a public meeting of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) revealed that officials were still trying to assess what to do with the extremely expensive spacecraft.

... continue reading