Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

I had Gemini and Claude write my email replies - but only one sounds like me

read original more articles
Why This Matters

This comparison highlights the evolving capabilities of AI-powered email assistants, emphasizing how different large language models (LLMs) like Gemini and Claude can produce responses that closely match individual communication styles. For consumers and the tech industry, it underscores the importance of personalized AI tools in enhancing productivity and maintaining authentic tone in digital correspondence.

Key Takeaways

Chandraveer Mathur/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.

ZDNET's key takeaways

Gemini powers Help Me Write for efficiency in Gmail.

You can use Gemini or Claude to draft context-aware emails.

Testing showed Claude is better at matching tone and requirements.

Three years ago, I started using Help Me Write, one of Google's first attempts at applied AI. The writing assistant is built into Google offerings like Docs and Gmail, and I found it could draft whole emails from scratch -- all I had to do was sign off on them. As much as I like Help Me Write, I've noticed the Gemini LLM underpinnings powering it somehow deliver even better results through Google's standalone AI app.

Since I was feeding Gemini my email threads for drafting responses, I decided to compare Claude's performance. After a week's worth of testing, I surprisingly found Anthropic's tools write messages a lot as I would.

What I'm comparing, and how I'm testing

These rival LLMs offer multiple models, but I'm sticking to Gemini 3.5 Flash for speedy response times, accessed through a Pro account. However, it's available for free, with liberal usage limits. Importantly, I've switched on Google Labs' Personal Intelligence toggle under Attachments > More Tools > Personal Intelligence. It pulls actionable stylistic cues and information from my prior Gemini chats, adding a personal flair to the current responses.

... continue reading