Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Could small-team science be dying out?

read original more articles
Why This Matters

The decline of small-team science signifies a shift towards larger research collaborations, which could impact the pace and nature of scientific innovation. As team sizes grow, the dynamics of research and the way breakthroughs are achieved may change, influencing both the scientific community and technological progress. This trend highlights the increasing importance of collaborative efforts in tackling complex scientific challenges.

Key Takeaways

The size of scientific research teams has increased steadily over time.Credit: twomeows/Getty

Few papers in history have had the disruptive impact of James Watson and Francis Crick’s 1953 Nature paper proposing the double-helix structure of DNA1. It’s a classic of small-team science; two authors proposing a paradigm-shifting idea that research teams around the world build on for years to come.

But a new analysis of authorship data that has been captured by the Nature Index over the past decade shows that small-team science is in decline. In some research fields — especially the biological and health sciences, in which Watson and Crick made their impact — solo- and dual-authored papers are increasingly rare.

Across the natural sciences, the proportion of papers in the index with one or two authors declined from 10.8% to 7.1% between 2015 and 2024. Over the same period, big-team science grew rapidly, with the greatest publication growth seen in papers with 11 to 50 authors. Overall, publications in the index with between 3 and 50 authors rose from 88.5% to 92.2%.

Although the Nature Index tracks only a subset of high-quality journals, the findings are consistent with previous studies showing a long-term increase in team size across science (see ‘Middle ground’). At the beginning of the last century, for instance, most papers were written by one or two scientists2. Since the mid-twentieth century, the average size of research teams has grown steadily across most scientific disciplines3.

According to Lingfei Wu, an information scientist at the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania who studies the effect of factors such as team size on scientific innovation, “The decline in one- and two-author papers is one of the most stable patterns in science.”

Team dynamics

Among the natural-sciences subjects in the Nature Index, biological sciences had the lowest proportion of small-team papers in 2024. One- and two-author publications slipped from 6.1% to 3.8% of biological-science papers between 2015 and 2024, whereas 3–50 author papers rose from 93.3% to 95.3%. Chemistry had the second-lowest proportion of small-team papers in 2024, at 4.7% of total chemistry papers, down from 8.2% in 2015.

In the health sciences, which have been included in the Nature Index since 2022, one- and two-author papers have flatlined at a rate of 1%.

The physical sciences is the only subject to have its small-team papers increase in absolute terms (by just over 300 in the 2015–24 period). However, they still dropped as a proportion of total physical-sciences papers (14.9% to 9.6%). This could reflect a trend in which small-team papers remain important to the subject, but large-team papers are growing at a much faster rate.

... continue reading