GoKawiilEver since the MacBook Neo was announced this spring, I've been looking for a serious alternative. Not a cheap knockoff that sacrifices quality for price. No, no. I was hunting for a Windows laptop with the same goal as the MacBook Neo—hiding its compromises and delivering an otherwise premium laptop at a lower cost. For months, it was crickets.
Then, the Dell XPS 13 showed up on my doorstep, and it understood the assignment. For many reasons, this was the one I'd been waiting for. But the question remains: Is it actually the better budget laptop? The answer surprised me when I dug into the testing.
Hidden Compromises
When the MacBook Neo was originally announced, it was a shocker. Apple coming in at the $599 price point for the base configuration felt unreal. Apple had never in its history brought the MacBook to such a low price. Even at its new $699 starting price, it's in unprecedented territory. Importantly, this encroached on the territory of Windows laptops, where it has traditionally had a monopoly.
Photograph: Luke Larsen
And while many Windows laptops are available at this price, they suffer from many of the same problems, such as cheap materials or corners cut with low-quality displays and touchpads. Even a cheap laptop I like quite a bit, like the HP OmniBook 5 (with the Snapdragon X Plus), has a weak point in its touchpad.
But the Dell XPS 13 sought to match the MacBook Neo's premium quality in nearly every aspect. It has the same starting price of $699 (or $599 for students). It's exactly the same size at just a half-inch thick, so when the lid is closed and you're holding it, it feels just as portable. The XPS 13 weighs 2.2 pounds, half a pound lighter than the MacBook Neo. The Neo isn't heavy, but holding both in your hands, the difference is noticeable. That's the first point in favor of the XPS 13.
Despite a slightly smaller screen (13 inches, measured diagonally), the MacBook Neo sits taller than the XPS 13 when the lid is open. That's because the XPS 13's 13.4-inch display is surrounded by much smaller bezels—particularly the bottom, which gives the XPS 13 a more modern look. The white keyboard and flashier color options of the MacBook Neo certainly have their appeal, especially since the XPS 13 comes in only two shades of silver. But in general, more screen real estate and smaller dimensions are preferable, especially if you want to travel on an airplane with your laptop.
And then there's the screen itself. Most $700 laptops have mediocre screens that aren't bright enough and have poor colors. I never expected Apple to skimp on the display, of course, and it didn't. It goes up to 509 nits (as tested) and has decent color reproduction. But the XPS 13 is better in three ways. First, it has a touchscreen, which MacBooks don't (yet) have. That's a nice addition for an entry-level model. It also has a 120-Hz refresh rate, which gives the screen fast, fluid responsiveness that not even the MacBook Air has. Again, that's a feature that's exceedingly rare to find on a budget-level laptop. Lastly, the XPS 13 has better color saturation, specifically on the Adobe RGB and P3 color scales. It's actually one of the better IPS screens I've tested on a laptop, and it's as sharp as the MacBook Neo.
None of these are weak points of the MacBook Neo, but it's worth noting that the XPS 13 has it beat in a number of these areas. That's also true of the keyboard and trackpad. Both are excellent on these laptops, and I found myself comfortable using them right off the bat. Again, trackpads in particular can be a sore spot for budget Windows laptops, but Dell smartly didn't skimp on it. Apple's the one that compromised on the keyboard, both by not including Touch ID in the base model and by removing backlighting (which the XPS 13 includes).
... continue reading