Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

AI Has a Discovery Problem

read original get Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI" by Ethan Mollick → more articles
Why This Matters

This piece argues that AI's real adoption bottleneck isn't model capability but discovery: users staring at a blank prompt box can't see what the technology could do for them. That framing matters for product teams, because it shifts the competitive frontier from raw intelligence to interface design, onboarding, and context-aware suggestion.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI" by Ethan Mollick — If the article's "blank text box" problem resonates, this book is basically a guided tour of what to actually ask an AI for. Mollick walks through concrete ways to use these tools at work and in daily life, which is exactly the discovery gap the piece describes. Think of it as a step up to the canyon rim instead of squinting at the sliver of sky.

See Co-Intelligence: Living and Working with AI" by Ethan Mollick on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

2026-09-03 The Discovery Problem

The biggest bottleneck to AI adoption is a simple question: what can this do for me?

The hard part is that you don’t know what you don’t know. You don’t know what a button does until you press it. Press me

You don’t know what a prompt can produce until you write it, hit go, and watch it run.

As long as capabilities stay locked behind a blank text box, the possibilities stay invisible. That’s a discovery problem, and it’s the one we’re still stuck on.

There are partial fixes. Templates give people something to run without needing to invent the request themselves. But then the question becomes relevance. Do these templates actually match your work? Do you care? Context helps too: a system that knows about you can suggest things that matter to you instead of things that matter in general. Both help. Neither solves it.

Alan Kay has a metaphor for this. Imagine you’re an ant at the bottom of the Grand Canyon. You look up, and your entire notion of the sky is a thin sliver of blue between two canyon walls. Someone standing on the rim sees the whole blue plane. Same sky, completely different sense of what exists. It’s not that the ant is less capable. It just can’t see the axis of possibility from where it’s standing.

Watch Alan Kay explain it

That’s the gap between a skilled AI user and everyone else. Take a non-technical marketing person and someone fluent in agents and tool use. The agent-fluent person can watch the marketer work for an hour and immediately see a dozen things to automate, delegate, or reinvent, including things the marketer hasn’t even tried yet. But put the most intelligent tool in the world in front of the marketer, and they’re staring at a blank prompt, unsure what to type. All that intelligence, and no way to see it.

This is the strange state we’re in: the system could do almost anything, but it requires the user to already know what to ask for. Too much of the work of discovering what’s possible falls on the person, when it should fall on the system. You’d expect something this advanced to reveal its own capabilities — gradually, contextually, in ways that match your actual work. We’re not there yet.

... continue reading