Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Poor hiring communication now carries a measurable cost, report finds

read original get Who: The A Method for Hiring (book) → more articles
GoKawiil Brief

A new analysis argues that candidate experience — including salary transparency, realistic job descriptions and consistent updates — has become a core part of employer branding. Companies with weak hiring communication pay at least 10% more per hire, and negative candidate experiences increasingly surface publicly through Glassdoor reviews and social media posts rather than word-of-mouth alone.

Why It Matters

GoKawiil's interpretation of the reporting above, not reported fact.

As job seekers gain more visibility into how companies treat applicants, hiring practices themselves become reputational assets or liabilities, not just internal HR processes. Firms that ghost candidates or communicate vaguely risk losing top talent, referrals, and future applicants, compounding recruiting costs over time.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Who: The A Method for Hiring (book) — If the article's point about clarity before the interview resonates, this hiring classic by Geoff Smart and Randy Street gives you a repeatable, structured interview process with scorecards and defined stages. It's a practical companion for building the kind of transparent, consistent candidate experience that protects your employer brand.

See Who: The A Method for Hiring (book) on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

Source: entrepreneur.com — Volen Vulkov, 2026-09-11

Published there as: “Hiring Transparency Is Becoming a Competitive Advantage. Here’s the Cost of Getting It Wrong.”

Read the original report → The summary and analysis above are GoKawiil's own, written from reporting by the source above. Facts and quotes belong to the original publisher.