Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Detailed report on the use of solar geoengineering

read original get Elizabeth Kolbert "Under a White Sky → more articles
Why This Matters

Solar geoengineering has been studied for decades without a coordinated research agenda, and Reflective's new SAI Research Roadmap is the first attempt to lay one out, with cost and timeline estimates. It matters because it pushes the debate from theory toward funded outdoor experiments, raising governance questions about who would ever authorize altering the atmosphere.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Elizabeth Kolbert "Under a White Sky — Kolbert's acclaimed book digs into exactly the kind of planetary interventions this report is about, including solar geoengineering and its unknowns. It's a readable way to get context on why researchers are debating stratospheric aerosol injection now rather than later.

See Elizabeth Kolbert "Under a White Sky on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

But even after at least hundreds of studies on the concept, known as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), big gaps remain in the scientific understanding of how well it would work and what else it might do—and there has been no systematic plan for clearing up that uncertainty.

Reflective, a research organization that funds studies on solar geoengineering, has today attempted to fill that gap with the release of its SAI Research Roadmap.

“Our mission is to equip the world with the data and tools required for informed decision-making about sunlight reflection fast enough to matter,” says Dakota Gruener, the organization’s cofounder and chief executive. “Our sense is the world may need to make very consequential decisions on timelines far shorter than our research system is prepared for.”

The hope is the exercise will guide scientific efforts and encourage philanthropies or government agencies to fund high-priority work and “responsibly accelerate research,” says Gruener.

If all the work is done in a coordinated way, it would take about a decade and cost around $370 million—and if it’s not, it would require roughly 20 years and nearly $1.4 billion, the report estimates.

While Gruener stresses that Reflective doesn’t advocate using this form of solar geoengineering, the report does make the case for conducting outdoor experiments, which would release successively larger amounts of sulfur dioxide (or materials that would convert into it) in the stratosphere to observe what happens.

That is a controversial standpoint. Since 2002, hundreds of academics have signed an open letter calling for a ban on outdoor experiments and an "international non-use agreement," arguing that such a powerful technology could never be governed in a globally equitable way. And some signatories argue that more studies can never address one of the biggest questions about using solar geoengineering: Who gets to do it.

“The first-order questions, from my perspective, are not technical,” Aarti Gupta, co-initiator of the non-use initiative and professor of global environmental governance at Wageningen University in the Netherlands, told me in a recent on-stage interview.