Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Werner Herzog Demolishes Talentless Hacks Who Use AI to Imitate Other Filmmakers

read original get Werner Herzog's "A Guide for the Perplexed" (book) → more articles
Why This Matters

Werner Herzog's blunt rejection of an AI film that cloned his style and voice highlights a growing tension between generative AI tools and creative authorship. His critique — that AI can only mimic what already exists — lands as studios and startups push AI-generated content and deepfaked likenesses into mainstream filmmaking, raising consent and originality questions for the industry.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Werner Herzog's "A Guide for the Perplexed" (book) — If Herzog's takedown of AI imitators left you wanting the real thing, this sprawling book-length conversation with Paul Cronin is the closest you can get to the man's own voice on filmmaking. It's packed with stories from Fitzcarraldo, Nosferatu and beyond, plus his blunt philosophy on why art comes from lived experience, not imitation.

See Werner Herzog's "A Guide for the Perplexed" (book) on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

Sign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!

The legendary German director Werner Herzog had a few choice words about other so-called “filmmakers” who use AI to imitate their inspirations — one of those inspirations being himself.

In an interview with IndieWire, the 84-year-old — whose wide-ranging filmography includes 1982’s “Fitzcarraldo,” 2009’s “Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans,” and 1979’s “Nosferatu the Vampyre“ — was asked about a 2025 movie called “About a Hero,” which made heavy use of AI to evoke the style of his films. It gets even more on the nose than that: on top of using an AI-generated script trained on his movies, it also featured AI-deepfaked Herzog as the narrator.

The flesh and blood director didn’t sound impressed.

“The intention of this young filmmaker was never to remake any [of my films], but making something in the spirit. And I immediately said, ‘You will fail. It is such a stupid idea,'” he said, in what we can imagine was his trademark husky voice.

“‘It’s phenomenally, abysmally stupid,'” Herzog drove home. “‘I will not take part in it.'”

Herzog seemed to venture that if AI is useful for anything, it’s replacing the talentless hacks.

“It’s so standardized that AI can step in because there’s not real storytelling,” Herzog sneered. “It’s mimicry of something that has happened before.”

“And I welcome AI to replace all the idiots who are into nothing but repeating, repeating, repeating until it’s ad nauseam,” he told IndieWire. “When it’s ad nauseam, please, please, please let AI step in and do the job.”

When it comes to artists, the irony of a technology like AI, which promises to let users create virtually anything they want, is that rather than realizing their creativity, it instead often ends up exposing how little of it they actually possess. Truly interesting uses of AI in art are few and far between; by and large it simply automates the process of churning out something unoriginal, only without the human spark or rawness unique to all of us that can elevate a work.

... continue reading