Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Cybercabs Are Taking Psychotic Routes That Turn Tiny Trips Around the Neighborhood Into Hour-Long Nightmares

read original get Garmin DriveSmart 76 GPS Navigator → more articles
Why This Matters

Reports that Tesla's Cybercab robotaxis are taking wildly inefficient routes—turning short trips into hour-long ordeals—highlight how far behind Tesla's self-driving service still is compared to competitors like Waymo. This matters because it exposes real-world limitations in Tesla's Full Self-Driving software, particularly its inability to use highways and apparent avoidance of railroad crossings, raising questions about the readiness of its robotaxi rollout.

Key Takeaways
Worth a Look

Garmin DriveSmart 76 GPS Navigator — If robotaxi routing algorithms are taking you on scenic tours you never asked for, having your own reliable GPS navigator gives you a second opinion on the best route. The Garmin DriveSmart offers real-time traffic and voice-guided navigation so you can spot a nonsensical detour before it turns your ten-minute trip into an hour-long ordeal. It's a handy backup for anyone increasingly relying on autonomous rides.

See Garmin DriveSmart 76 GPS Navigator on Amazon → Affiliate link — we may earn a commission on purchases, at no extra cost to you. Product picked by AI based on this article; it is not a tested recommendation.

Sign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!

The Tesla Cybercab is innovating impressively impractical ways of getting from Point A to Point B.

One Cybercab passenger in Austin complained that what should’ve been a ten minute trip devolved into a 70-minute long nightmare as the steering-wheel-free robotaxi spiraled its way down the most circuitous route possible.

The driverless cab started the journey by driving in the complete opposite direction of the destination for miles, the exasperated passenger wrote in a Reddit thread, then turned around and took a “massive” detour through east Austin.

If it was instead a Google Maps car trying to image every inch of the city, you’d have to admit it was a job well done.

“My Cybercab held me hostage for an hour,” the rider wrote in the post, spotted by Electrek. “Guess the Cybercab wanted the scenic route today.”

According to Electrek, the reason that the trip took so long is almost certainly because the Tesla Cybercabs can’t drive on highways yet. The consequently tortuous routes that the cabs have to take may not immediately be clear to a passenger, though, as the app only shows a price estimate and not a projection of how long the trip will take, the blog noted.

Like other robotaxi services, the Cybercabs — which use a version of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving software that hasn’t been released to the public — operate only within a geofenced area that’s been extensively mapped. (Waymo, the leading robotaxi company, does already allow its cars to use highways in some cities.)

There are other signs that the Cybercabs (and Tesla’s confusing named “Robotaxis,” which are self-driving taxis in the form of modified Model Ys, instead of a purpose-built vehicle), are still walking on eggshells compared to its competitors. Some passengers say that the cabs also avoid railroad crossings, which could add to trip times. (Tesla is being investigated for FSD frequently going haywire near these crossings and driving into the path of oncoming trains.)

Do all these restrictions make for a properly autonomous cab? If you had a time machine, you could go back to 2019 and ask CEO Elon Musk for an answer: “If you need a geofence area, you don’t have real self-driving!” he infamously proclaimed.

... continue reading