Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

This Doctor Runs a $2.3 Billion Health Startup. He Says This Is Why Walmart and IBM Couldn’t Crack Healthcare.

read original more articles
Why This Matters

The failures of Walmart Health and IBM Watson Health underscore that healthcare cannot be disrupted with typical Silicon Valley or retail playbooks, since its challenges stem from complex incentives, regulation, and reimbursement systems rather than a lack of technology. This matters because it signals to investors and tech companies eyeing healthcare that quick, tech-first solutions are unlikely to succeed without deeper systemic understanding.

Key Takeaways

Listen to this post

Key Takeaways Oliver Kharraz is the founder and CEO of the healthcare marketplace site Zocdoc.

He explained that disruption playbooks don’t work in healthcare because the field faces a “complex systems and incentives problem,” not a technology issue.

Walmart Health and IBM Watson Health are two examples of healthcare initiatives that fell flat.

Walmart and IBM thought they could fix healthcare. Zocdoc’s founder and CEO, Oliver Kharraz, says they missed the point.

In a new commentary piece for Fortune, Kharraz explained that healthcare is harder to disrupt than giants like Walmart and IBM expected. Kharraz is the CEO of Zocdoc, the $2.3 billion healthcare marketplace that helps patients find and book appointments with doctors online. He comes from a 300-year family tradition of doctors.

“Don’t mistake me. Healthcare desperately needs fixing and people who are willing to take ambitious swings at improving it,” Kharraz wrote. “But nowhere is it more true that ideas are easy and execution is hard than in healthcare.”

Many companies have tried to reinvent healthcare

Companies like Walmart and IBM entered healthcare with big ambitions. Both ultimately pulled back, Kharraz wrote.

Walmart opened low-cost clinics in 2019, promising transparent prices for primary and dental care. But by April 2024, it said it would close all 51 locations in five states and end its virtual-care business after rising costs and difficult insurance reimbursement made the model unprofitable.

... continue reading