ESBO flags volatility in AI chatbot brand-mention scores, citing Ahrefs data
ESBO Ltd founder describes receiving a five-figure proposal based on a single screenshot showing a client's competitor named in an AI assistant's answer while the client was absent. Running the same query six times showed the client appearing three times and the competitor four, suggesting no brand consistently dominated the answer. The piece cites Ahrefs research tracking over 43,000 queries, finding AI Overview answers changed in 70% of cases within about two days, with cited sources overlapping only 54.5% between checks.
GoKawiil's interpretation of the reporting above, not reported fact.
The findings suggest that single-snapshot 'AI visibility' reports, often sold as diagnostic or actionable, may reflect random variation in chatbot outputs rather than a stable measure of brand presence. This could mean marketing vendors charging for one-time AI visibility audits are offering limited practical value unless they track mention rates over repeated queries and time. It implies buyers of such services should ask vendors how many times and over what period a query was tested before trusting the result.
- A founder was quoted a five-figure fee based on a single AI-answer screenshot showing a competitor but not her brand.
- Repeating the same query six times showed both the client and competitor appearing inconsistently across answers.
- Ahrefs data on 43,000+ queries found AI Overview answers changed in 70% of cases within about two days, with only ~54.5% source overlap between checks.
Source: entrepreneur.com — Boris Dzhingarov, 2026-10-19
Published there as: “That AI Visibility Score You Just Bought? It’s Probably Just a Screenshot of a Die Roll.”
Read the original report → The summary and analysis above are GoKawiil's own, written from reporting by the source above. Facts and quotes belong to the original publisher.