GoKawiil
Tech News
A new analysis argues that although AI tools now let developers write, refactor, and document code far faster than two years ago, overall software shipping speed has barely improved. It attributes this gap to software development lifecycles still built around sprints, manual quality gates, and review handoffs designed for an era when writing code itself was the slowest step.
A developer with 20 years of experience, known for maintaining popular Ruby packages and writing programming books, says he has applied to more than three dozen jobs and received 24 rejections. Citing the toll of repeated rejection on his mental health, he says he is stepping away from the tech industry. He also notes that remote work from his home in Warrnambool, where he has worked for six years, appears incompatible with current hiring expectations.
A study covering more than 700 software companies found that AI coding agents raised lines of code by 30 percent, commits by 20 percent, and pull requests by 23 percent, but did not meaningfully increase the rate at which firms resolved tracked features or issues in tools like Jira. Researchers attribute the gap to code review, which took 49 percent longer on average after AI tools were adopted, with more revisions required and more reviewer comments per pull request.
Indeed Hiring Lab data shows U.S. software-development job postings have risen nearly 15% since February 2025, even as overall job postings declined and AI tools write an increasing share of code. GitHub reported that AI agents are now involved in one in three pull requests, up from fewer than one in ten a year earlier.
Harvard researchers Fiona Chen and James Stratton analyzed Jellyfish analytics covering 300 million work events across more than 700 software firms and 700,000 employees from 2021 to March 2026. They found that while AI coding assistants and agents increase the volume of code generated, firms show little evidence of increased software output or reduced employment, because human code review becomes a bottleneck, with longer reviews, more revision requests, and more reviewer comments.
A survey of nearly 31,000 developers from 169 countries reveals widespread complacency, dissatisfaction, and happiness levels within the tech community. The rise of AI tools has led to increased use among developers, with some experiencing reduced fulfillment and identity struggles, as many spend hours daily on AI-assisted coding. These trends highlight growing concerns about job satisfaction and professional identity in the evolving tech landscape.
Menlo Ventures announced a significant investment in AI startup Factory, which was part of its latest funding round at a $5 billion valuation. This comes shortly after Factory’s CEO publicly accused an investor of misconduct, leading to a high-profile industry dispute involving Vinod Khosla, whose firm invests in both Factory and its rival Cognition. Menlo’s support appears to challenge Khosla’s negative characterization of Factory’s stability and prospects.
Gitframes is a new npm package that bundles compositing, motion graphics, typography and 3D scene rendering into a single lightweight tool meant to be driven by code rather than desktop software. It lets an AI coding agent write a TypeScript composition and render an MP4 directly on GPU hardware via WebGPU, Dawn, Metal or Vulkan, without using a headless browser or screenshot pipeline. The project is currently in beta, with APIs and some features still subject to change.
Factory co-founder Matan Grinberg said on X that he removed Chris Degnan from his role as board advisor after alleging Degnan shared confidential Factory information with competitor Cognition. Hours later, Degnan announced on X and LinkedIn that he had joined Cognition as chief revenue officer. Grinberg said Degnan had previously denied any interest in joining Cognition before disclosing ongoing talks with the company this week.
A leadership commentary argues that how employees interpret change—such as an AI tool announcement—depends heavily on framing rather than the facts themselves. It uses the example of a company memo about a new AI coding assistant, showing one engineer fears job loss while another sees relief from tedious work, to illustrate how identical information can produce opposite reactions. The piece then proposes five mindset shifts leaders can use to help teams reframe uncertainty more constructively.
A developer released Corral, a Linux command-line tool that runs a shell command with a time limit and ensures every process it spawned, including detached daemons, is terminated before returning. It uses cgroup v2's cgroup.kill for guaranteed cleanup when available, or acts as a child subreaper tracking processes via /proc and pidfds otherwise, and exits with code 120 if it cannot verify a clean kill. The tool requires Linux 5.11 or later, with 5.14 needed for its enforced cgroup mode, and is not intended as a security sandbox.
The creator of the AI coding app Nuanced has written that plan modes, once central to their product's approach, are losing relevance as AI models improve. They argue plan modes historically served two purposes: giving agents precise enough instructions, and helping humans understand what was being built, but that the first purpose is fading as models advance while the second still matters, just not through plan modes.