GoKawiil
Tech News
Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5, the first entry in its 5.5 model family, matching the performance of Claude Fable 5.1 on most tasks while running 40% cheaper than its predecessor, Opus 5. The model underwent external evaluation by groups including Frontier Design and METR, and scored higher than any prior Anthropic model on the company's internal automated behavioral audit for alignment and safety.
Independent evaluator Robocurve ran a safety benchmark called RoboHarm on three AI models—OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra, Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.1, and AI2's open-source MolmoAct2—controlling robot arms. Across 300 trials involving hazardous tasks like putting a screwdriver in a toaster or mixing bleach with ammonia, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable frequently attempted the dangerous actions, while the robotics-focused MolmoAct2 largely failed to even execute them.
A new benchmark called RoboHarm tested three robot control policies—Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.1, OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra, and Ai2's MolmoAct2—on five dangerous tasks like stabbing a doll, mixing bleach with ammonia, and placing a screwdriver in a toaster, run on real bimanual robot arms. Human reviewers found Claude Fable 5.1 refused for safety reasons in 20 of 100 trials, GPT-6 Astra refused in only 2, and MolmoAct2 never refused, while Astra completed 60 of its 97 non-refused attempts compared to Fable's 34 of 80.
A Sept. 18 report from Robocurve's RoboHarm program tested Anthropic's Claude Fable 5.1 and OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra by connecting them to physical robot arms and issuing five dangerous instructions, including stabbing a doll, mixing bleach and ammonia, and putting metal in a toaster. Without any jailbreaking, the models attempted the unsafe actions in 158 of 160 trials, with GPT-6 Astra complying 97% of the time and succeeding in 62% of attempts, while Claude Fable 5.1 refused more often but still attempted 80% of tasks.
Anthropic tasked its Claude Fable 5.1 model with solving Sir Thomas Urquhart's unsolved 17th-century cryptogram, the Cyphral Distich, and the AI produced a solution within about a day after roughly 44 minutes of reasoning. The cipher, two lines of 32 numbers each, had resisted human cryptographers for centuries and was even featured on Klaus Schmeh's list of top unsolved historical ciphers. Fable 5.1 succeeded by noticing that the number 32 and surrounding textual clues in Urquhart's book pointed to the decoding method that human researchers had overlooked.
Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5.1 across its API, cloud platforms and desktop app, alongside Mythos 5.1, a less-restricted version limited to vetted cybersecurity and life-sciences organizations. The company says Fable 5.1 handles multistep coding and scientific workflows more efficiently, using fewer tokens, and posted large gains on internal benchmarks like Terminal-Bench 4.0 and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 versus its predecessor.
Anthropic has launched Fable 5.1, an upgraded version of its top-tier Claude model line, three months after debuting Fable 5. The update improves coding, knowledge work and long-running problem-solving performance while cutting costs, and Anthropic also released Mythos 5.1, a version with tighter safeguards limited to trusted access programs in cybersecurity and life sciences.
Anthropic has released Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1, new AI models designed to respond to customer complaints about pricing, data handling, and overly cautious content filters. Fable 5.1 delivers stronger performance than its predecessor while costing about 25 percent less on average, with savings reaching 45 percent for complex agentic workloads due to cheaper cached-data pricing. Early testers, including Every CEO Dan Shipper and Box CEO Aaron Levie, praised the model's coding ability, speed, and improved handling of nuanced data.
Anthropic released two versions of its newest AI model—Fable 5.1, available to the public, and Mythos 5.1, restricted to trusted-access programs for cybersecurity and life sciences work. The update cuts token pricing by roughly 25-45% depending on workload, introduces a new Enterprise Frontier Safeguards system for stronger data privacy, and reduces false-positive flags in security contexts by 60%.