Anthropic study of 207,000 sessions shows Claude mostly used for data analysis, not idea generation
Anthropic analyzed 207,000 Claude and Claude Code research sessions using privacy-preserving methods to map how scientists use the AI across fields and tasks. It found heavier relative use in formal sciences like computer science, mathematics and statistics, and lighter use in health and lab-based physical sciences, with data analysis and writing dominating usage—accounting for roughly a third of Claude sessions and nearly half of Claude Code sessions.