Fast Company reports that tech-industry-backed super PACs are spending tens of millions of dollars to influence midterm elections, yet their political advertisements largely avoid discussing artificial intelligence. The PACs are funded by donors with a stake in favorable AI policy, but their messaging focuses elsewhere.
fastcompany.com
· 2026-10-15
Ahead of the Nov. 3, 2026 midterm elections, CNET reports a wave of AI-generated political ads, some disclosed and some not, including manipulated content targeting Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and James Talarico. A CNN analysis cited in the report found campaigns and groups have spent more than $16 million on AI-generated ads this cycle, following a 2024 incident where an AI voice clone of Joe Biden was used in illegal robocalls that led to a $6 million fine.
cnet.com
· 2026-10-14
Researchers tracking political advertising found that roughly $80 million has already been spent on AI-generated ads for the 2026 U.S. midterm campaigns, appearing across television and social media. Many of these ads, ranging from hyperrealistic deepfakes to subtler AI enhancements, do not disclose that AI was used in their creation.
fastcompany.com
· 2026-10-07
Governor Gavin Newsom has signed AB 1130, a law that adds real penalties—fines up to $5,000 per violation and possible misdemeanor referrals—for social media influencers who fail to disclose being paid to promote political content. California previously required such disclosures but had no enforcement mechanism when influencers ignored the rule. The bill follows reports that billionaire Tom Steyer paid numerous influencers during his failed gubernatorial bid, many of whom didn't initially reveal the payments.
techcrunch.com
· 2026-09-20
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals voted 2-1 to block an FCC Media Bureau notice that would have let political parties and joint fundraising committees, not just individual candidates, claim the discounted 'lowest unit charge' broadcast ad rate ahead of the election. Four Democratic candidates had sued, arguing federal law reserves that discount for candidates alone, while national Republican committees backed the FCC's broader interpretation.
arstechnica.com
· 2026-08-26