Zig developer proposes compile-time trait-based alternative to interfaces
A programmer writing about recent experience with the Zig programming language describes two conventional approaches to polymorphism in Zig: dynamic interfaces using virtual tables, and comptime 'duck typing' using type reflection and monomorphization. The author argues both approaches have tradeoffs—interfaces add runtime overhead while comptime duck typing lacks strict type contracts—and introduces a technique resembling traits to address these limitations.