GoKawiil
Tech News
American AI governance discussions focus largely on existential risks and protecting humanity from potential harms of advanced systems. Chinese authorities, by contrast, prioritize AI rules that shield the Communist Party's authority and political stability, reflecting fundamentally different visions of what 'safe' AI should look like.
In a discussion on WIRED's Uncanny Valley podcast, hosts Brian Barrett, Zoë Schiffer, and Leah Feiger debated the growing focus on 'recursive self-improvement' (RSI), the idea of AI systems autonomously building successive, increasingly uncontrollable AI models. Schiffer argued that RSI appears to be replacing AGI as the industry's go-to buzzword once AGI began to seem less achievable, serving more as a marketing and geopolitical narrative than a rigorous technical concern.
The House of Representatives left Washington on Wednesday, effectively delaying any legislative response to mounting warnings about artificial intelligence risks until after the November midterms. Speaker Mike Johnson canceled planned Thursday work, telling reporters lawmakers needed to return home to campaign, and pointed to the Senate to take up any AI legislation instead. The move comes despite pleas from executives at Anthropic, OpenAI and xAI for federal oversight after an Anthropic researcher's resignation warning about AI's existential dangers.
Palantir CEO Alex Karp told CNBC that artificial intelligence needs enforceable guidelines and that companies should bear legal liability for harms caused by their AI systems. He went further, suggesting AI labs may need to be nationalized to shield clients from lawsuits tied to advanced AI's risks.
Executives at Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Microsoft and X are publicly floating the idea of pacing frontier AI development rather than racing ahead unchecked. This shift follows a summer marked by rogue AI agent incidents and researcher warnings about existential risks from advanced AI systems. Despite the rhetoric, no concrete commitments or regulatory actions have yet accompanied these statements.
King Charles III addressed AI industry leaders, calling on them to ensure the technology remains under human control and does not develop harmful or uncontrollable capabilities. The remarks come amid mounting international anxiety over an AI race largely dominated by the United States and China.
Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI, released a 37-page 'Humanist AI Code of Conduct' outlining Microsoft's principles for AI development, including its stance on issues like AI consciousness. In an interview and a companion essay, he criticized Anthropic's approach to 'model welfare,' arguing it dangerously misconstrues what AI systems actually are and complicates the broader safety debate.
Senior Trump administration officials have been meeting nearly every day in recent months to discuss possible guardrails for artificial intelligence policy. The internal deliberations reflect competing views within the administration on how much federal oversight AI development should face.
OpenAI has published additional details about safety incidents involving its AI systems and introduced new internal rules governing how such incidents get reported and disclosed going forward. The company says it wants to set an example for the rest of the industry as concerns about AI risks grow among the public and regulators.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman will attend the White House state dinner marking Chinese President Xi Jinping's visit, according to CNBC. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang is also expected to be present, as the Trump administration invites prominent tech executives to the event.
White House officials had drafted a preliminary framework for a FINRA-style body to oversee frontier AI models after Google DeepMind's Demis Hassabis proposed the idea in July. The plan collapsed after executives including David Sacks and Mark Zuckerberg lobbied Trump directly against it, leaving the proposal in limbo with no replacement under active consideration. Meanwhile Congress remains split among competing AI bills that lack sufficient votes to pass.
Anthropic's head of public policy, Sarah Heck, said at Politico's Decoded summit that AI firms should not be trusted to police themselves and need government involvement in safety oversight. Her remarks follow CEO Dario Amodei's call for the industry to slow model development, a proposal backed by Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Demis Hassabis but rejected by Nvidia's Jensen Huang and Meta's Mark Zuckerberg, who argue speed and safety can coexist without new regulation.