Maskot | Maskot | Getty Images
If there is still no clear answer to the question of how artificial intelligence is influencing gains and losses in the job market, there is at least one AI question that job candidates, and current workers hoping to keep their roles, should be prepared to answer clearly in 2026. "In many roles, the baseline will no longer be 'Can a person do the job?' but rather 'Can they do it in a way that adds unique value beyond what AI can do alone, and what people can do alone?'" said Daniela Rus, director of the MIT Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. The evolving relationship between AI and human work is a critical issue in the labor market with the technology's payoff beginning to show up in productivity data, at least anecdotally. Minneapolis Federal Reserve President Neel Kashkari said that artificial intelligence is causing big companies to slow hiring, and that many businesses are seeing "real productivity gains." Kashkari told CNBC's "Squawk Box" that the impact remains mostly at large firms, and overall he expects continued low hiring and low firing in the labor market. But he added, "There are too many anecdotes of businesses using this and actually seeing real productivity gains. Businesses that I talked to that two years ago were skeptical are saying, 'No, we're actually using it now.'" "I would say that we're actually not hiring fewer people," AMD CEO Lis Su told CNBC's Jon Fortt from the CES conference in Las Vegas. "Frankly, we're growing very significantly as a company, so we actually are hiring lots of people, but we're hiring different people. We're hiring people who are AI forward."
watch now
Last year, CEOs at Shopify, Accenture, and Fiverr were among examples of business leaders overseeing layoffs while also urging employees to upskill or face the prospect of finding themselves less relevant in the workforce. Micha Kaufman, CEO of Fiverr, said when he encouraged teams to "deepen their AI skills, it was not a symbolic gesture. It was a recognition of where the world of work is moving. AI is reshaping every industry, and the most responsible thing any company can do is prepare its people for that change early, transparently, and with purpose." Some of the ways that corporations are talking about this shift remain vague, for example, AI handling repetitive or computationally heavy tasks so humans can focus on higher-order tasks involving judgment, empathy, creativity, and context. This vision of human work improved by AI, with the technology in the background, represents "a move from replacement to augmentation," according to Rus. But workers would be right to be skeptical. "These transitions are about efficiency, but also about trust and transparency: workers will need to trust that companies aren't simply using AI as cover for cost-cutting," said Rus. She added that there is a risk that rather than amplifying uniquely human skills, the AI transition erodes them. Kaufman acknowledged transparency from executives can't eliminate worker anxiety. "By learning to use AI, people might fear they're training the tools that replace them," he said. "But I see something very different happening. The individuals who learn to guide AI, to interpret and improve its outputs, are not training their replacements; they are becoming the architects of the next generation of work," he said.
Fiverr, which offers a platform connecting employers to freelance workers, is on the frontlines of AI adoption since it facilitates work where AI use is rising. According to its 2024 Freelance Economic Impact Report, 40% of freelancers were already using AI tools, usage that Kaufman said was saving on average more than eight hours a week. Its research found that early adopters are delivering better work, and being more highly compensated. "Those who have learned to integrate AI are not being replaced by it; they are thriving because of it," he said. A recent study from The Budget Lab at Yale provides some encouragement that the relationship between AI and jobs is so far not all that different from past periods of technological advancement. It concluded that the broader labor market has not been disrupted in the period since ChatGPT's late 2022 release, and that the available data indicates that AI automation is not eroding the demand for knowledge-based labor across the economy. The Budget Lab researchers cautioned that no findings can be deemed conclusive in the first few years of a new technology's deployment, but they pointed to historical precedents, such as the introduction of the computer to offices, that show "widespread technological disruption in workplaces tends to occur over decades, rather than months or years." "Even if new AI technologies will go on to impact the labor market as much, or more, dramatically, it is reasonable to expect that widespread effects will take longer to materialize," the Yale report stated.
watch now