Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Daily briefing: Wearable robot could help kids with neuromuscular disease stand

read original get Exoskeleton for Kids → more articles
Why This Matters

A new wearable robotic device offers promising improvements in mobility for children with spinal muscular atrophy, potentially transforming therapeutic approaches and enhancing quality of life. This innovation highlights the growing role of personalized, gamified robotics in healthcare, emphasizing the importance of tailored interventions for neurological conditions. Additionally, the research underscores the broader impact of rigorous peer review and sleep science on advancing scientific knowledge and health outcomes.

Key Takeaways

Hello Nature readers, would you like to get this Briefing in your inbox free every day? Sign up here.

To help children to engage with the challenging sessions using a new robotic device, researchers gamified the training so that the kids saw themselves kicking a ball as they extended their leg. (Yuebing Li et al/Nature)

A lightweight, wearable robotic device can help children living with a rare condition called spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) improve their knee function, which could help them stand unassisted. The device provides resistance training tailored to the individual needs of children who are unable to walk because of SMA. After using the robot for six weeks, six children — aged between 6 and 10 years — could stand from a lower sitting angle, had 20% bigger quadriceps, and could generate more than twice as much force when bending their knees, compared to pre-training assessments.

Nature | 5 min read

Reference: Nature paper

Papers that are put through the wringer during the peer-review process go on to have a higher impact in science than those that sail through it. Researchers used artificial intelligence to analyse the peer-review correspondence associated with a selection of papers published in Nature Communications. They found that papers that elicited stronger criticism from reviewers and required more-extensive revisions received more citations than did papers that drew lighter comments. A higher ‘quality’ of reviewer comments — those that were more specific and well-reasoned — was also associated with a boost in citations to the published product.

Nature | 5 min read

Reference: arXiv preprint (not peer reviewed)

An extra-long snooze after a short night’s sleep appears to offset some of the negative health effects associated with sleep deprivation. Researchers found that people who caught up on sleep the night after a brief slumber — termed ‘sleep rebound’ — were less likely to die in the eight years following the study period than were people who didn’t. They also found that most sleep rebounders didn’t wait until the weekend to sleep in. Instead, they tried to compensate for lost sleep as soon as possible.

Science | 4 min read

... continue reading