Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Peppa Pig Owner Demands Child Actors Sign Away Voice Rights to AI

read original more articles
Why This Matters

This development highlights the growing concerns over AI's impact on voice rights, especially for vulnerable groups like children. It underscores the need for stricter regulations and ethical considerations in AI training and intellectual property rights within the entertainment industry, protecting performers from exploitation and ensuring informed consent. For consumers, it raises awareness about how AI could influence the future of media and the importance of safeguarding personal rights in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

Key Takeaways

Sign up to see the future, today Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up Thank you!

Voice actors have been waging a fierce battle with the entertainment industry over training AI to synthesize their voices, effectively allowing them to reproduce their likenesses in perpetuity.

Not even underage performers are safe from the encroaching tech. As Deadline reports, the owner of “Peppa Pig,” US entertainment juggernaut Hasbro, is now asking child actors of the beloved children’s animated TV series to surrender rights over their own voices to AI under new contract terms.

Inside sources said it’s part of a much larger trend, with rights holders coercing children into signing over their rights.

Industry advocacy groups were taken aback. A new open letter by the Agents of Young Performers Association (AYPA) has been signed by over 1,000 members of the public, which argues that “any agreement involving a child’s voice should be fully exempt from all AI usage.”

While the letter didn’t call out Hasbro explicitly — it mentions a “major studio who owns the IP for an international children’s franchise producing a long running animated television series” — Deadline‘s sources said the letter was indeed aimed at the conglomerate and its handling of the “Peppa Pig” contracts.

“Where the performer is a child, consent must be treated with the greatest of care,” the letter reads. “Children cannot provide fully informed legal consent and a parent or guardian’s approval should never be used as a blanket license to capture, clone, train, or reuse a child’s voice indefinitely.”

Meanwhile, Hasbro has seemingly been trying to rein in the PR disaster in the making, telling the publication that it was committed to protecting child performers’ rights, while claiming it was looking to approach AI discussions responsibly and transparently.

The company also acknowledged the letter directly.

“Hasbro is aware of the open letter circulating regarding AI clauses in children’s performance contracts,” a spokesperson told Deadline. “We are not able to comment on specific negotiations or contractual arrangements.”

... continue reading