Skip to content
Tech News
← Back to articles

Precise DNA base editing using AlphaFold3-based contact modelling

read original more articles
Why This Matters

This research advances DNA editing precision by leveraging AlphaFold3-based contact modeling to improve base editing accuracy and reduce off-target effects. Such innovations are crucial for developing safer gene therapies and more reliable genetic modifications, benefiting both the biotech industry and consumers seeking personalized medicine. The integration of structural prediction tools into editing strategies marks a significant step toward more predictable and controlled genome editing technologies.

Key Takeaways

a, On-target editing rates of ABE8e and Cas9(K1020D)-TadA8e at seven endogenous genomic loci in HEK293T cells. Editing rates are shown for the A base indicated in parentheses for each target site. b, c, Comparison of genome-wide sgRNA-dependent off-targets (evaluated by dI-profiling) between ABE8e and Cas9(K1020D)-TadA8e in HEK293T cells using HEK4 sgRNA (b) and ABEsite16 sgRNA (c). Each dot represents an off-target A. The relative reductions in total off-target signals for Cas9(K1020D)-TadA8e compared with ABE8e are 83.0% and 69.0% at HEK4 (n = 1,717 sites; b) and ABEsite16 (n = 270 sites; c), respectively. d, Position of K1020 in an AF3-predicted structure of the Cas9-sgRNA-DNA ternary complex, generated using the ABEsite16-OT206 off-target DNA and the ABEsite16-sgRNA (seed 194503). e, f, Average minimum distance over 50 ns MD simulation (n = 1000 frames) between heavy atoms of the residue 1020 (K1020 or K1020D) and ntsDNA at the ABEsite16-OT206 off-target site (e) and the ABEsite16 on-target site (f). Simulations were performed using AF3-predicted Cas9-sgRNA-DNA ternary structures with the ABEsite16 sgRNA (seed 1, 164664; seed 2, 32383). The centre line indicates the median; box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles; the whiskers extend to the minimum and maximum values within 1.5× IQR. Dots represent individual data points. P values were determined by one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. g, h, Minimum distance between the residue 1020 (K1020 or K1020D) and ntsDNA over a 50 ns time course at the off-target site (g) and the on-target site (h) in the MD simulation. Solid lines represent the mean of the minimum distance calculated over an 11-frame sliding window. Shaded regions denote the maximum and minimum values within the corresponding sliding window. i, Distribution of mismatch positions along the protospacer among HEK4 off-target sites grouped by dI-profiling signal reduction in Cas9(K1020D)-TadA8e-treated samples relative to ABE8e-treated samples. Off-targets were ordered by signal reduction, and the top 5%/10% (“most reduced”) and bottom 5%/10% (“least reduced”) groups were selected. The upper two plots show the proportion of mismatch at each protospacer position among sites in the top 5% or bottom 5% group of dI-profiling signal reduction. The lower two plots show the difference in the proportion at each position between the top 5% and bottom 5% groups, and between the top 10% and bottom 10% groups (top minus bottom), suggesting a modest positional trend with relatively more 5′-end mismatches in the most reduced sites. j, On-target editing rates of Cas9 nuclease and Cas9(K1020D) nuclease at four endogenous genomic loci in HEK293T cells. k, On-target editing rates of BE4max and BE4max(K1020D), in which the Cas9 component carries the K1020D mutation, at three endogenous genomic loci in HEK293T cells. The subscripted red C denotes the edited C position within the protospacer and the PAM sequence is underlined. l, m, Comparison of genome-wide sgRNA-dependent off-targets (evaluated by Detect-seq) between BE4max and BE4max(K1020D) in HEK293T cells using HEK4 sgRNA (n = 246 sites; l) and VEGFAsite2 sgRNA (n = 512 sites; m). Each dot represents an off-target site. The relative reductions in total off-target signals for BE4max(K1020D) compared with BE4max are 73.3% and 63.5% at HEK4 (l) and VEGFAsite2 (m), respectively. n-p, On-target and off-target editing by PEs whose Cas9 components are either wildtype or carry the K1020D mutation, using pegRNAs with known off-target loci. Red bases denote the edited positions, and the PAM sequence is underlined. In a, j, k and n-p, each dot indicates an independent biological replicate (n = 2); bars indicate the mean.

Source data