Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
Key Takeaways Speed in a crisis is built before it happens: appoint your response team, pre-approve an initial statement and decide who has authority to issue it within minutes, not days.
Your first statement doesn’t need to answer everything — it needs to show leadership is present and engaged before fabricated narratives fill the silence.
Last year, most people encountered Astronomer through a viral clip. In July 2025, the data company’s CEO and chief people officer were caught embracing on a Coldplay concert kiss cam and became one of the most viral moments of the year. Like everyone else, I watched the video. But I found myself paying attention to something entirely different. While most people were glued to the Jumbotron replay, I was wondering how long it would take for the company to respond and what that response would look like.
That’s how people in my profession are wired. We’re always trying to shorten the gap between when an incident becomes public and when an organization begins leading the conversation. Notice I didn’t say ends the conversation.
Astronomer, I believe, ultimately delivered a mature response. Rather than pretending the moment hadn’t happened or trying to out-lawyer the internet, the company acknowledged the attention, leaned into it with an unexpected cameo from Gwyneth Paltrow and gave people a reason to focus on something other than speculation.
What interested me even more, though, was everything that happened before it.
The concert was on a Wednesday night. By Thursday, fabricated apologies attributed to the CEO were circulating online, one of them viewed millions of times before anyone confirmed it was fake. People confidently debated what leadership believed, how the situation must have been handled internally and what it said about the company’s culture. The company’s first statement — confirming that the board had launched an investigation — did not arrive until Friday. By then, Astronomer was responding to a story that had already taken shape without it.
The one strategic shift I would have made was to enter the conversation sooner. The statement Astronomer eventually issued was the right one; it just came roughly 48 hours late. A spokesperson could have said on day one that the board was aware of the issue, was working to understand the facts and would take appropriate measures based on what it found. That did not require conclusions the company was not yet prepared to make.
It would have shown that leadership was engaged, reduced the perception that the people implicated in the situation were effectively overseeing their own investigation and given Astronomer something to point back to as events unfolded.
... continue reading